crunch, crunch, crunch Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/2346907.stm
I think we are gravitationally bound to our Local Group, which is not affected by the cosmic expansion as the gravity overcomes it. If proton decay doesn't get them first. Also a lot of angular momentum would have to be lost. More here http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/report/news/september25/universe-925.html
Either way it is possible to have infinite living time. Just need an advanced enough machine. Live faster & faster or slower & slower.
The wishy-washy theory school perptuating their nonsense, still. How is it that if the universe is 14 billion year old and middle aged, that it is going to die out in 150 billion year? Or does the wishy-washy theory school have a whole bunch of new age classifications between middle age and old age? Or is it that middle age in wishy-washy theory gets to expand and contract a few time before it morphs into old age?
Are you planning on responding to any of the direct questions given you in the other threads? Or do you accept defeat? - Warren
Sorry, chroot! I didn't realize anyone had engaged in the other discussions. I certainly couldn't accept defeat, at least not from anyone who endorsed the wishy-washy theory school, since they only have foggy nonsense and limited thought to draw upon for evidence. So which threads had someone addressing evidence that I presented? The one about the Human Genome Project, which proves Darwinian Theory of Evolution is not true? Or the NASA evidence which describes, and shows photographs of, billions of galaxy orbiting a central gravity source, and which proves that the "Big Bang!" is false and that the Unified Field Theory is true? Or are those question in one of the other threads in which, heretofore, no one would address any of the evidence which undermined their protectionist view?
John MacNeil: I hope someday you find out the identity of your mother. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! You're one messed-up individual.
Is that what passes for intelligent discussion in your little clique, Mr.G.? Just because you are brain-washed by the simple-minded wishy-washy theories of corporate/science doesn't mean that everyone in the forum is. I'm sure eventually someone will engage intelligently, and curiously, in real discussion. Surely not everyone is so irremediably indoctrinated into believing impossible fantasy to the point that they disregard scientific evidence. You, however, Mr.G., have proved your childish obstinacy, or is it slavish devotion?
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Translation: WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION, SOLDIER?!?!?! - Warren
John, go back to the forum view. See all the ones where I have the last post? Yeah, answer those ones. In case you can't read, these are the threads: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=11072&pagenumber=5 http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12034&pagenumber=2 - Warren
A last post by you, chroot, is an automatic indication that nothing intelligent has been posted. The only reason that I stopped back in here so soon was that the numbers showed two posts since my last visit, and I thought perhaps that someone else may have posted in between my last post and your last post. If you wish to engage in discussion, chroot, there is plenty that I have posted which you assiduously ignore, a reflection, no doubt, on your ability or your being brain-washed.
So, let me get this straight: You're not going to respond to the direct questions asked of you in those threads? - Warren
