Yet another "human caused" Global Warming "expert" fanatic expressing his stupidity :
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN05379470

This guy claims "Global warming kills more people than 9/11 every week." :rolleyes:

Roflsauce. Less than 1% of CO2 is man made.

http://www.newsmax.com/brennan/Global_Warming/2007/09/25/35562.html

the anthroprogenic sources of CO2 account for exactly 0.11 percent of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. In other words, 99.89 percent of the greenhouse effect has not a damn thing to do SUVs, jet travel, backyard barbecues or any other human activity.

The late New Zealand professor Augie Auer explained that three-quarters of the planet is ocean, and 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is governed by water vapour.

Most CO2 comes from volcanoes.

http://www.ecoenquirer.com/EPA-volcanoes.jpg

Man, this is so scary. See all those deadly greenhouse gases? Are the plants still alive? Hello? Ohmygod, We're so f*cked....

Yet another "human caused" Global Warming "expert" fanatic denier expressing his stupidity :
the anthroprogenic sources of CO2 account for exactly 0.11 percent of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.

Yet another "human caused" Global Warming "expert" fanatic expressing his stupidity :
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN05379470

This guy claims "Global warming kills more people than 9/11 every week." :rolleyes:

Has the article changed? I can't see that quote mentioned

Yet another "human caused" Global Warming "expert" fanatic denier expressing his stupidity :
Yet another global warming hoax cultist with no scientific data...:rolleyes:

Roflsauce. Less than 1% of CO2 is man made. If you read your source link, you will discover that you have once again posted a stupid misinterpretation of what started out as a silly assertion.

Nowhere does any actual scientist, in your link or anywhere else, claim that less than 1% of the CO2 in the air is man made.

You are quoting the author of the article, and he has made a mistake in retailing the assertions of his pet elderly retired scientist (now dead, and unable to defend himself). You can see the mistake in the article itself, because he includes the original assertion quoted from the scientist.

You have already had this pointed out to you, in another thread where you posted that article and that assertion.

This is getting beyond absurd.

The figure from the Mauna Loa analytical observatory was about 38% and rising, last I checked. You can also find reasonable info on Wikipedia, Britannica, and any number of other sites.


If I recall correctly, deliberately misrepresenting articles and by inference slandering the scientists you quote is looked upon with disfavor on this forum.

All CO2 is biogenic too now. Good one.

FYI: CO2 is GOOD for the environment and is necessary for photosynthesis.

CO2 is GOOD for the environment and is necessary for photosynthesis.

Up to a point.
Ever tried breathing CO2.. ? Try it, and see how good it is for you.

Up to a point.
Ever tried breathing CO2.. ? Try it, and see how good it is for you.
I breath in CO2 everyday and so do you.

I breath in CO2 everyday and so do you.

Haha good one.. :thumbsup:

I breath in CO2 everyday and so do you.

do you ever use Di-Hydrogen oxide?

Has the article changed? I can't see that quote mentioned

You're right, someone re-edited that article because I took the quote directly from about the 5th paragraph of that piece.

This article and others have it :
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/USA/NY_skyscraper_hosts_two_spidermen_on_same_day/articleshow/3107692.cms

Its true.

Another little known fact is that breathing kills more people every week than anything else.

Its true.

Another little known fact is that breathing kills more people every week than anything else.

rubbish - its brushing your teeth - name 1 person who didn't brush their teeth the day they died :D

You're right, someone re-edited that article because I took the quote directly from about the 5th paragraph of that piece.

This article and others have it :
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/USA/NY_skyscraper_hosts_two_spidermen_on_same_day/articleshow/3107692.cms

maybe the loon retracted his statement - or asked the news source to retract it because he was misquoted.

While you and I differ over the reality causes of climate change (and perhaps even the existence of it :) ) this frikin loon does no-one any favours :bugeye:

maybe the loon retracted his statement - or asked the news source to retract it because he was misquoted.


It's in several other news articles if a google search is done, I'm not going to dig it up. And on the video they showed on TV, you could actually see the sign he put up on the tower making the 9-11 claim.

This guy's overboard, possibly even by ELF standards.

do you ever use Di-Hydrogen oxide?
Do you ever use brain cells?

Meanwhile, what happened to global warming anyway?

http://gallery.myff.org/gallery/274022/prediction-HC-RSS.PNG

The graph shows the Global warming prediction of James Hansen, done in 1988, compared to the 12 month running average of the britisch Met Office (HADCRU3T) and the satellite series of the lower troposphere as compiled by RSS and displaced vertically to match the starting value of the Hansen prediction.

Really?

So what?

lack of braincells?

I'm not sure if it was the same guy as in the article or not, but on the radio they were talking about a guy who was accusing congress of involuntary manslaughter because they hadn't done enough about global warming. I think his argument was something along the lines of: Congress hasn't done anything about global warming, so gas prices have gone up, so people spend money on gas instead of healthcare, so Congress has committed manslaughter against those people.

This shit is rediculous.

Obviously, if the boost in CO2 is not at the moment causing an overall temperature rise quite as rapid as that predicted by one of several models used in 1988,

and some politicians somewhere are saying foolish things,

then there is nothing to worry about.

Clearly we can double the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere without any serious effects on the climate beyond ordinary weather patterns.

I'm not sure if it was the same guy as in the article or not, but on the radio they were talking about a guy who was accusing congress of involuntary manslaughter because they hadn't done enough about global warming. I think his argument was something along the lines of: Congress hasn't done anything about global warming, so gas prices have gone up, so people spend money on gas instead of healthcare, so Congress has committed manslaughter against those people.

This shit is rediculous.

That's what spooks me about this guy's message on the tower and what you said; these people are really bonkers and politicians are eating this shit up like it's the truth !
Heck, I bet they're even feeding this shit to kids in school now like it's "a fact" that humans are going to fry up the atmosphere. Going to recruit a whole new generation of eco-Nazis.