Fate of the Universe

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by blobrana, Feb 12, 2003.

  1. blobrana Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,214
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2003
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Slacker47 Paint it Black Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    667
    Crap, I liked the Big Crunch. Well, I can always just jump into a black hole hoping to escape this universe.

    Wouldn't it be cool to be able to crawl completely into one of your orifices and be in an inverse world?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. everneo Re-searcher Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,621
    Blobrana :

    ur website gave some useful info. and links. thnx. keep it up.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Pollux V Ra Bless America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,495
    I swear I heard the same thing on Nova at least a year ago. That the universe would never end.
     
  8. Beercules Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    342
    Hmmm, I wonder what implications inflation will have for a big crunch? Our region of the universe is flat, but the universe as a whole is much bigger and may be closed and finite. If so, there might still be enough mass to make omega=>1.
     
  9. blobrana Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,214
    Yes it`s possible that we do live in a region of space that is low density... the data that the MAP probe gathered originated 300,000 after the BB only covers the visual universe, but i feel that there is no reason to suggest that any other part of space out-with the visible universe (apart from any boundary condition) is any different or has slightly different `constants`...

    i`m convinced that the universe is flat, there will not be a big crunch.
     
  10. DirtyDave Registered Member

    Messages:
    17
    i agree, i think the univere will continue to expand, its amaizing tho coz if the universe expanded any slower the universe would have collapsed on its self, neway i have a queriy, i was reading stephen hawkins book, and he said that the universe expanded 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (i fink its the right n number) times its own size in a fraction of a second, would this not have been faster than the speed of light?
     
  11. blobrana Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,214
    There were probably TWO distinct episodes of super-inlation...
    Space-time perhaps increased 10^50! ( i think) in a fraction of a second...it is ok , because there is no speed limit on the actual `fabric` of space-time. The velocity of light just limits particles and forces contained within space-time...

    Just remember that the `space` that the BB ids inflating into doesn`t contain any time (or space!)...therefore distances and speeds become meaningless...
     
  12. DirtyDave Registered Member

    Messages:
    17
    sounds so simple wen its broken down, cheers:m:
     

Share This Page