After some consideration of how the history of 'the west' brought about it's evil ideology, I have come to the conclusion it is not intentionally evil; rather it beleives it's ideology is correct and for the best. To consider that people actually set up the rules we live by, and to consider that in the beginning, when the world was large and there were (relatively) few people in it, then we can see almost anyone could take (empty) land for their own, and rule it. The only problem would be other civilisations attacking, but this would not be a problem if they could not be found, or if other civilisations did not attack; if they condoned the new civilisations ideology. There may have even been tax in exchange for peace. If we take the current (western) ideology it can (probably) be understood how such a thing came about, and we can see, in retrospect, how those concerned probably could not see the evil they were creating; they thought they were doing right. Religion has almost certainly been present since the beginning of time, and we can see that the Jewish religion was aware of the presence of the Holy Spirit long before others' were aware of it. Whether the Jews were responsible or not, it is not unlikely that religion at that time, or in the early days, demanded the imprisonment of those who had the embodiment of the Holy Spirit come to them. They are those who are unable to follow rules and they are a danger to society! One must be able to imagine such a person/people, who would radiate gaiety, being imprisoned for such a crime. (Unfortunately in the currect sociological climate gaiety has a different biological focus, and this is because of the current ideology). One must also be able to imagine them being kept a prisoner until such a time as they can follow the rules. Imagine a jailer coming to the cell door, and saying through an opening to the prisoner "You will now take your meal...you will eat your meal", and imagine the rebellion from the prisoner! Some prisoners would be kept longer than others; it would depend on the degree to which the Holy Spirit has visited them. Unfortunately the presence of the soul within people means the prisoners would also be doing something they don't want to do! They are having it both ways (as it were). It must have only been after they could accept the ways of society that they were allowed free, but that doesn't guarantee they would live by those rules once they were free. Even if they could live by them, that doesn't mean they would enforce them! They probably wouldn't even enforce the ideology with their own children. Once free they undoubtedly could not live within their usual society, so they moved to (an)other land(s). The jailers were not to know what they were doing; they thought what they were doing was correct! So these criminals undoubtedly ruled their (new) land(s), and they were therefore King(s); with probably only wives and children who else was there to oppose them? Visits from their previous society inhabitants would prove they were reformed criminals, because they would be abiding by the ideoogy they had learnt in prison. Thus in the new land when people with ailments were discovered, this ideology was instilled in them. Someone who had been beaten was beaten again, and someone who was raped was raped again, and this was done until those concerned accepted it. This was only in keeping with the ideology that had been taught, but anyone who knows what is being written about here will know there is a difference!!! The embodiment of the holy spirit is a very special case, and it is for the reasons outlined above that I beleive those who have been visited by the holy spirit should be imprisoned, and it is there they should stay until they die! They cannot be allowed free in society because they are a danger and they will almost certainly cause trouble (eventually). And once they have been imprisoned, and an attempt is made to instill them with the correct ideology, the presence of the soul means they will find it hard, and they will not like it! Prison does not neccesarily have to be hard-time, rather it should be large-scale segregation, where only a small few are allowed free; those who can truly accept the way of the world, and will enforce it! So once they are already imprisoned, their soul has already been invaded, because it is something they do not want! So their use in prison should be work. They will form the basis of industry and manufacture, while those who are free-will not work as such, but they will be 'social-workers', i.e. they will live social lives engaging with (members of) society, doing very little except what they choose, and it will be their job to discover/report those who have been visited by the holy spirit. So we have a large-scale segregation of society: work-houses, and 'social-workers'; the former being the workers to give a country financial stability, and products for use, and the latter being regulators of society, who are responsible for the (psychological) welfare, and general stability, of society. The population of the work-houses will be comprised only of gays, homosexuals, left-handers, a retards, to ensure the survival of wider society, while the population of wider society will be comprised of all other people. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You mean the history of the West after middle eastern religions invaded, teaching that "good" and "evil" exist?
Well inhabitants of the west were originally from the middle east. Anyway good and evil do exist! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Violence is inevitable if there are no alternatives. It sort of depends on the position, disposition, degree of clash, skill and intention of those involved in the negotiation. Sometimes there are no alternatives.
Wes makes evil VERRRY relative... evil is all about where you're standing. But are you truly evil if there aren't any alternatives to your action?
I wasn't accepting this, and if you look at my reply you'll see I wasn't! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! My reply was a reply to the two separate issues in hand. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I don't accept this! I beleive d.n.a proves nothing, and if it proves anything it proves what the researcher wants it to prove. (D.N.A is the name of chemical(s). I think you mean D.N.A testing! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! ) Incidentally I have to say the ideology has evolved into an evil witch-hunt.
