Electrodynamic Spin Gravity, a theory of the cause of gravity, invariant with Newtonian mechanics, but not supporting the concept of "pull" (attraction).

The "push" concept is the only way one object can move another.

See

http://zarkov.ath.cx/

Published papers
Submitted by zarkov on Sun, 07/20/2003 - 15:50.

Published papers

Electrodynamic Spin Gravity | Student Edition 2003

Solar System Parameters from Gcentral spin


This topic has been posted in the Astronomy section, and there are some obversations recorded there.

However I thought the Maths Gurus would now like to tear it to pieces.

It is a straightforward model, with exceptional accuracy, and it gives a structure to the Universe, where each spin centre can be considered a preferred FoR.

It can be used to predict the actual size of a planet given it's mass. This feature can be used as a means of determining the intergalactic magnetic field density that our Solar System is immersed in.

I would appreciate this discussion to remain on topic.

James R (the moderator here) and I do not see eye to eye, so the ball is in your court.

:)

Hi Zarkov,

Concerning your student edition of ... ehr.. electromagnetic spin gravity.

You ask us to have a look at the math. What math ? I see 10 pages of text, then 10 pages of elementary calculations where you replaced "r v^2" the standard Newtonian calculations by what you call Gcentral spin. Fine, no problem (well, not at the parts of math I looked at, I am excluding calculation errors here), but this does not explain anything new. What you have done is taken classical mechanics and thrown in a "new" variable.

Concerning the text: you associate gravity with electromagnetism, but there is no prove for this, only explanation in words. Is there a calculation that motivates this statement ? Is there experimental evidence for a relation between gravity and electromagnetism in this low-energy situation ?

I did not read everything yet (I am at work), so perhaps I missed something. It would be appreciated if you could elaborate more on the connection between gravity and electromagnetism.

Further questions:
- What are the postulates of your theory ? Or do you use Newtonian mechanics as a base on which you build your ideas ? If so, derive the relation between gravity and electromagnetism from Newtonian first principles. Otherwise, list all postulates you use.
- Is there a physical interpretation for your "Gcentral spin" variable ?
- How should we interpret this "spin" of yours ? Is it some sort of angular momentum, or related to it ? Why did you call it "spin" ?

Anyway, many more questions pop into my mind, we'll start with those :)

Bye!

Crisp

The thread Zarkov has referred to above is this one:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=24897

Further discussion can take place there.

I am familiar enough with this theory not to want it clogging the Physics & Math forum.

But don't take my word for it. Please take a look and judge for yourselves if you wish.

PS When Zarkov says he has "published" his papers, he means only that he has posted them on the internet.