View Full Version : Economic Processing Zones


lixluke
10-08-06, 01:02 PM
Economic Processing Zones are slave shops all around the world used for western business interests:

Click this link, and sift down through the list before clicking any one of them. There are many:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=economic+processing+zones

Baron Max
10-08-06, 07:12 PM
Ahh, okay ...so what?

Baron Max

TimeTraveler
10-08-06, 07:23 PM
Economic Processing Zones are slave shops all around the world used for western business interests:

Click this link, and sift down through the list before clicking any one of them. There are many:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=economic+processing+zones


Argh could you have come up with an uglier phrase than economic processing zones? Jesus Christ!

lixluke
10-08-06, 07:54 PM
Ahh, okay ...so what?

Baron Max
Well it seems that the capitalist system operates on the basis of might makes right. Not human rights.

Baron Max
10-08-06, 08:01 PM
Well it seems that the capitalist system operates on the basis of might makes right.

Might DOES make right! Our human history has shown that, proved that, over and over and over and over and over again. What more proof do you need or want?

Not human rights.

Human rights are bestowed upon citizens by the nations who has fought and died in order to provide and protect those rights. The USA did NOT fight wars in order to bestow "human rights" on the rest of the world. Fuck the rest of the world!

Baron Max

lixluke
10-08-06, 08:14 PM
I think I am getting what you are saying.
It is very interesting.

The USA never had any intention to protect human rights. It simply used it's might to take over the land from the indians and terrorize the rest of the world based on the might makes right ideology. Even its own people (americans) are slaves to business interests of the rich. It is just reality because might makes right. If we know the mass media is lying to us, just stop watching it, and allow things to be as they are because this is inevitable. Accept it, and find a way to live with it and around it.

The USA is a terrorist, and there is nothing we can do about it because might makes right.
Are you a citizen of the US? Considering we give up, and stop fighting the USA, what should we do with ourselves?

lixluke
10-08-06, 08:33 PM
Waitaminnit!
Job lovers.
We can manipulate job lovers using might makes right.

Basically, the job lovers abide by the might makes right attitude.
We should not allow our jobs to go over seas because these are our jobs. These are our jobs because might makes right, and we are might so we are right.

If we can convince idiot job lovers that their jobs are being stolen, and moved overseas to economic processing zones, we could well have a chance at fighting the EPZs. We can make it look like they are stealing American jobs, and making off great. The job lovers will get mad, and claim that we should shut down these EPZs, and bring the jobs back to the United States. No more EPZs = less poverty = more competition for workers in the USA = less oppression of illegal immigrants = freedom.

Raithere
10-09-06, 12:42 AM
Economic Processing Zones are slave shops all around the world used for western business interests: How do you figure?

~Raithere

lixluke
10-09-06, 06:16 AM
Tax free zones that allow rich businesses to enter the country for slaves and resources. These zones are specifically designed to allow huge companies to go into a country to basically take what they want for practically nothing.

Countries are not allowed by the world bank and imf to use their own resources. Whenever a leader has tried to implement a democracy, nationalize the resources as belonging to the people, thereby keeping the western business interests out. The CIA goes in, and sabotages everything for so that foreign businesses are allowed to come in, and rob everything from the country.

lixluke
10-09-06, 06:23 AM
Witness the total lack of products made in america.
How pathetic indeed.
http://www.buyamericanmart.com/index.html

Raithere
10-09-06, 03:02 PM
Tax free zones that allow rich businesses to enter the country for slaves and resources. These zones are specifically designed to allow huge companies to go into a country to basically take what they want for practically nothing. Generally speaking, the idea is to increase foreign investment and national exports. This is typically good for a nation's economy because revenue is flowing into the economy; it results in increased employment and GDP. This is why these nations make such agreements. It is also worth noting that not all SEZ involve "western" or "first world" countries. So in any case your broad generalization is false.

Countries are not allowed by the world bank and imf to use their own resources. Whenever a leader has tried to implement a democracy, nationalize the resources as belonging to the people, thereby keeping the western business interests out. The CIA goes in, and sabotages everything for so that foreign businesses are allowed to come in, and rob everything from the country. Can you support either of these assertions?

~Raithere

lixluke
10-09-06, 07:38 PM
This is typically good for a nation's economy because revenue is flowing into the economy
It is not good for the economy of the country. It is good for western rich business interests. Otherwise, they would not create these EPZs turning poor countries that could have been prosperous into hellhole factories to produce goods for the rich.

TimeTraveler
10-09-06, 08:05 PM
Tax free zones that allow rich businesses to enter the country for slaves and resources. These zones are specifically designed to allow huge companies to go into a country to basically take what they want for practically nothing.

Countries are not allowed by the world bank and imf to use their own resources. Whenever a leader has tried to implement a democracy, nationalize the resources as belonging to the people, thereby keeping the western business interests out. The CIA goes in, and sabotages everything for so that foreign businesses are allowed to come in, and rob everything from the country.

Whats wrong with that? Maybe it's because corporations not countries own resources. DUH! Corporations own property, as according to rules, only those who can defend it and pay for it, own it. This means you don't even own your house, or the land it's on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_acquisition

lixluke
10-09-06, 08:07 PM
That is exactly what is wrong. The land was stolen from people for the sake of corporations. Now the people live in hell as corporate slaves.
Their resources and land were robbed, and now they are in concentration camp sweatshops that we so innocently call "Economic Processing Zones".

TimeTraveler
10-09-06, 10:29 PM
Waitaminnit!
Job lovers.
We can manipulate job lovers using might makes right.

Basically, the job lovers abide by the might makes right attitude.
We should not allow our jobs to go over seas because these are our jobs. These are our jobs because might makes right, and we are might so we are right.

If we can convince idiot job lovers that their jobs are being stolen, and moved overseas to economic processing zones, we could well have a chance at fighting the EPZs. We can make it look like they are stealing American jobs, and making off great. The job lovers will get mad, and claim that we should shut down these EPZs, and bring the jobs back to the United States. No more EPZs = less poverty = more competition for workers in the USA = less oppression of illegal immigrants = freedom.


There is no such thing as a stolen job, jobs are created all the time. The fact that our economy is inefficient has nothing to do with stolen jobs and everything to do with how we treat small businesses.

Raithere
10-09-06, 11:28 PM
It is not good for the economy of the country. It is good for western rich business interests. Otherwise, they would not create these EPZs turning poor countries that could have been prosperous into hellhole factories to produce goods for the rich. I've already heard your assertions. Repeating them is not convincing.

Try supporting that this is the case and try not to rely solely upon examples that are 20+ years old.

The first point you need to tackle is that not all EPZ agreements involve "western" countries". So your general statement is apparently false. Would you care to be more specific?

~Raithere

lixluke
10-10-06, 08:44 PM
If it is false, I would like to see any EPZ that the World Bank, IMF, and any western entity does not have their hands in. That takes no part in the affairs of these assholes.