jps
11-01-03, 09:36 PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1076084,00.html
Israel has been described as the top threat to world peace, ahead of North Korea, Afghanistan and Iran, by an unpublished European Commission poll of 7,500 Europeans, sparking an international row.
The survey, conducted in October, of 500 people from each of the EU's member nations included a list of 15 countries with the question, 'tell me if in your opinion it presents or not a threat to peace in the world'. Israel was reportedly picked by 59 per cent of those interviewed.
Looking at this logically, it seems very reasonable to say that Israel is a greater threat to world peace than North Korea, as at this point, NK hasn't been in combat(aside from a few skirmishes here and there) for quite a while, and the only demand its making in order to abandon nuclear weapons, is for a non-aggression pact with the US.
Israel on the other hand is in a constant struggle against its own opressed inhabitants who have great sympathy and support in surrounding countries, which Israel has no qualms about attacking. Israel also is a country with a large nuclear arsenal which it has threatened to use on occasion, and is completely unwilling to abandon.
The leaking of the results of the poll to El Pais and the International Herald Tribune has sparked a bitter row, with a major Jewish human rights and lobbying group, the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, demanding that the EU be excluded from the Israel-Palestinian peace process and accusing Europe of suffering the worst outbreak of 'anti-semitism' since World War Two.
Israeli Ministers and spokesman have also been at pains recently to insist that a definition of modern 'anti-semitism' should include criticism of the way the state of Israel chooses to protect itself, defining that criticism as an overt attack on Israel's survival.
Now this is ridiculous. To say that opposing Israel's actions(or even Israel's existance) is anti-semitic is akin to saying that opposing Saudi Arabia's governments actions is anti-muslim.
Is Neteuri Karta anti-semitic?
Israel has been described as the top threat to world peace, ahead of North Korea, Afghanistan and Iran, by an unpublished European Commission poll of 7,500 Europeans, sparking an international row.
The survey, conducted in October, of 500 people from each of the EU's member nations included a list of 15 countries with the question, 'tell me if in your opinion it presents or not a threat to peace in the world'. Israel was reportedly picked by 59 per cent of those interviewed.
Looking at this logically, it seems very reasonable to say that Israel is a greater threat to world peace than North Korea, as at this point, NK hasn't been in combat(aside from a few skirmishes here and there) for quite a while, and the only demand its making in order to abandon nuclear weapons, is for a non-aggression pact with the US.
Israel on the other hand is in a constant struggle against its own opressed inhabitants who have great sympathy and support in surrounding countries, which Israel has no qualms about attacking. Israel also is a country with a large nuclear arsenal which it has threatened to use on occasion, and is completely unwilling to abandon.
The leaking of the results of the poll to El Pais and the International Herald Tribune has sparked a bitter row, with a major Jewish human rights and lobbying group, the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, demanding that the EU be excluded from the Israel-Palestinian peace process and accusing Europe of suffering the worst outbreak of 'anti-semitism' since World War Two.
Israeli Ministers and spokesman have also been at pains recently to insist that a definition of modern 'anti-semitism' should include criticism of the way the state of Israel chooses to protect itself, defining that criticism as an overt attack on Israel's survival.
Now this is ridiculous. To say that opposing Israel's actions(or even Israel's existance) is anti-semitic is akin to saying that opposing Saudi Arabia's governments actions is anti-muslim.
Is Neteuri Karta anti-semitic?