oh damn, I thought this was going to be an editorial by YOU for once, but alas it was just another freakin news item. I think you posted 12 today(and not a single post with anything besides an article you ripped off a website). Chill the hell out, if you want to talk about something in the news then actually comment on it, this is getting rediculous.
Yes Adam, please take a break. Posting an link or two that you might have an opinion about and want to discuss is one thing but what you are doing is just spam. We can all read and use a mouse. Thank you.
It would seem the Guardian just can't ever seem to bring itself to say or write "Arafat". I wonder why?
1) More Israeli innocents have died in the last month than Palestinians 2) Israel apologized and admitted fault for their attack killing 14 innocent. 3) When Hamas attacks, Arafat says "It's your fault Sharon" and "you've brought this upon yourself". 4) Shehada should not be killed? If CONSTANTLY targetting civilians is not reason enough for death than I don't know whta the fuck is. 5) Everyone knows Sharon and Arafat need to be gone before peace can occur. However, for some reason your articles always seem to leave out Arafat. They go on and on about mistakes Sharon has made and then call only Hamas the problem on the other side. Arafat is in complete support of Hamas, otherwise he wouldn't have the authority to call a cease-fire. Oh, and he wouldn't say "good job" to the murderers.
