Mystech
08-04-04, 04:23 AM
Well I was on one of my usual IRC hang outs the other night (I'm sure many of you, just as I, are familiar with the idea of substituting things like IRC for any sort of real life) and someone begins expressing quite a bit of confusion over the website http://www.twink.net
Now don't worry about clicking the URL, it's entirely work safe. Though to be honest you may want to hide your monitor away form anyone anyhow, as you'll probably get laughed at for looking at such a goofy site. It looks like some sort of children's coloring book or something.
Well, the URL alone was enough for me to decide to give it a look, the obvious connotations are of course something of sugnificant appeal to me, after all. Anyhow as I think should be obvious, my expectations turned out to be entirely misleading, with rather humerous and ironic results. Anyhow, after looking the site over a few times I decided to shoot off an e-mail to the webmaster:
Greetings,
I happened to be chatting online one rather recently when a fellow patron of my preferred network posted a link to your site, twink.net, and began expressing quite a bit of confusion. Rather curious myself, I just had to give the site a look over, and I must say that it’s content was quite different from what my initial reaction to the URL had lead me to expect. Let me congratulate you on having such a wonderfully keen and whimsical eye for layout and composition, I must say that visually your site is quite a treat, and the artwork there, though relatively simple is quite pleasing.
Admittedly, music preformed on toy pianos doesn’t exactly hold much appeal for me, even if it is a particularly interesting novelty. What has captured my attention, however is the site itself, as I may have made clear already. I mentioned certain expectations derived from the URL, this is something I must imagine you have heard before, expectations which were certainly tickled a bit more upon being greeted by an image of a rainbow on the main page. I couldn’t help but feel that the whole site is trying to hint at something delightfully subversive, and rather comical, in a sense, for such a site set up to produce such an overt child’s story book type of aesthetic. . Given your clear eye for graphic design and accomplishing a thematic layout, I simply can’t bring myself believe that these prominent elements-the domain name, rainbow, and prominence of the rabbit (which certainly has a many similar connotations attached to it in a number of cultures)-are merely coincidental.
If I may be so bold as to finally get around to the point of this e-mail, I’d quite simply like to ask if I’m recognizing a genuinely intended theme on your site, or if perhaps my undiagnosed paranoid schizophrenia is acting up again, and I’ve convinced myself that I’m seeing secret patterns where there are none. If I’m right in my suspicions, then I don’t suppose I should have to be any more specific in describing what exactly I think I’m seeing. However if I’m wrong, then I suppose I should prepare to test just how politely I can explain what the heck I’m talking about without offending, or seeming rather perverse of mind.
so what do you think, folks? Am I looking for dirtyness in places where it just doesn't exist, or does there really seem to be a sort of subversive subtext to the layout of this site?
I'll post back here later once I get a responce from Mike Langley, who owns the site.
Now don't worry about clicking the URL, it's entirely work safe. Though to be honest you may want to hide your monitor away form anyone anyhow, as you'll probably get laughed at for looking at such a goofy site. It looks like some sort of children's coloring book or something.
Well, the URL alone was enough for me to decide to give it a look, the obvious connotations are of course something of sugnificant appeal to me, after all. Anyhow as I think should be obvious, my expectations turned out to be entirely misleading, with rather humerous and ironic results. Anyhow, after looking the site over a few times I decided to shoot off an e-mail to the webmaster:
Greetings,
I happened to be chatting online one rather recently when a fellow patron of my preferred network posted a link to your site, twink.net, and began expressing quite a bit of confusion. Rather curious myself, I just had to give the site a look over, and I must say that it’s content was quite different from what my initial reaction to the URL had lead me to expect. Let me congratulate you on having such a wonderfully keen and whimsical eye for layout and composition, I must say that visually your site is quite a treat, and the artwork there, though relatively simple is quite pleasing.
Admittedly, music preformed on toy pianos doesn’t exactly hold much appeal for me, even if it is a particularly interesting novelty. What has captured my attention, however is the site itself, as I may have made clear already. I mentioned certain expectations derived from the URL, this is something I must imagine you have heard before, expectations which were certainly tickled a bit more upon being greeted by an image of a rainbow on the main page. I couldn’t help but feel that the whole site is trying to hint at something delightfully subversive, and rather comical, in a sense, for such a site set up to produce such an overt child’s story book type of aesthetic. . Given your clear eye for graphic design and accomplishing a thematic layout, I simply can’t bring myself believe that these prominent elements-the domain name, rainbow, and prominence of the rabbit (which certainly has a many similar connotations attached to it in a number of cultures)-are merely coincidental.
If I may be so bold as to finally get around to the point of this e-mail, I’d quite simply like to ask if I’m recognizing a genuinely intended theme on your site, or if perhaps my undiagnosed paranoid schizophrenia is acting up again, and I’ve convinced myself that I’m seeing secret patterns where there are none. If I’m right in my suspicions, then I don’t suppose I should have to be any more specific in describing what exactly I think I’m seeing. However if I’m wrong, then I suppose I should prepare to test just how politely I can explain what the heck I’m talking about without offending, or seeming rather perverse of mind.
so what do you think, folks? Am I looking for dirtyness in places where it just doesn't exist, or does there really seem to be a sort of subversive subtext to the layout of this site?
I'll post back here later once I get a responce from Mike Langley, who owns the site.