Nikelodeon
10-23-06, 01:22 PM
Mate, I hope you know I was kidding!!!!
|
|
View Full Version : Dear outlandish Nikelodeon 10-23-06, 01:22 PM Mate, I hope you know I was kidding!!!! Oniw17 10-23-06, 01:37 PM He's banned. Anyone know the link to the thread? spuriousmonkey 10-23-06, 02:15 PM i missed the soap...when is the re-run? invert_nexus 10-23-06, 07:01 PM So. He was banned for what? The ban list says swearing. This is fucked up. It's probably about time to cut and run if this shit goes on. It's been pretty good so far, but fuck this shit. sets a timer for this post/thread getting deleted If that happens then I'm outta here. No bullshit. John99 10-23-06, 07:03 PM who wants to look at that shit? geodesic 10-23-06, 07:20 PM o. He was banned for what? The ban list says swearing. Yes, but so essentially does the Baron's. No complaints there. Without seeing the thread, it's hard to tell, but Nickelodeon felt the need to apologise/clarify, and he wasn't banned. And it's only a three day ban. This is fucked up. It's probably about time to cut and run if this shit goes on. It's been pretty good so far, but fuck this shit. In general sentiment I agree with you. One banning in a couple of weeks is hardly a massive change given the number of extra moderators. However, if the new mods don't share our views on the use of certain words, it'd be nice of them to let us know, so we can explain our thoughts (as I'm sure many people are only too willing to do). Absane 10-23-06, 09:39 PM I'm all about freedom and free speech. Why delete threads? It's sad :( sargentlard 10-23-06, 10:43 PM Outlandish brings it on himself. All he ever does is pick fights. invert_nexus 10-23-06, 11:00 PM Yeah. Like I said in the other thread, flaming has always carried with it the random threat of banning. So that's nothing really new. But, it irks that the stated reason for banning is 'swearing'. And the Baron has the same damned reason for his banning. Why even put a reason if that's the reason given? It's fucking lame. What would happened if what's his nut was banned for threatening to slit my throat? Banned. Reason: profanity. Give the right damned reason. Anyway. I still wonder if a warning was issued. I hope so. But you never know. Bah. Oniw17 10-24-06, 12:12 AM I remeber now..."I'm gonna beat your ass when I get off your mom" "You think you can take me?".... He got banned for that? I thought you guys were messing around. Nikelodeon 10-24-06, 01:17 AM He got banned for that? I thought you guys were messing around. We were. redarmy11 10-24-06, 01:19 AM Why was Abdullathebomber banned? :confused: Oniw17 10-24-06, 01:23 AM 69? WTF??? Sciforums is that old? redarmy11 10-24-06, 01:44 AM Just for fun I've taken the stats from the ban list and, fully utilising the power of Excel, created a league table to show the most rabid, trigger-happy, ban-crazy moderators to avoid. Here are the results: Mod ............ Kills James R .......165 goofyfish ..... 121 Porfiry .......... 44 Pseud0 ........... 2 Clearly heading the field at the moment: James R. AKA "The Voice of Reason". AKA "Chopper". Well done James - keep it up! Absane 10-24-06, 01:55 AM I think goofyfish is the badass of mods. I think he is more willing to ban than James R. Those two play good cop/bad cop. James tries to give people a chance and just warn them. Goofy will kick the shit out of you. Absane 10-24-06, 01:57 AM What you should do is figure out bans per day, beginning with the day each became a mod. Then we can see who the most trigger happy is. It would be like who masturbates the most during the day :D spuriousmonkey 10-24-06, 02:31 AM Goofyfish is just very clear. That makes him an excellent moderator. And you can reason with him perfectly. He just expects the same attitude back and rightly so. Zakariya04 10-24-06, 02:50 AM Just for fun I've taken the stats from the ban list and, fully utilising the power of Excel, created a league table to show the most rabid, trigger-happy, ban-crazy moderators to avoid. Here are the results: Mod ............ Kills James R .......165 goofyfish ..... 121 Porfiry .......... 44 Pseud0 ........... 2 Clearly heading the field at the moment: James R. AKA "The Voice of Reason". AKA "Chopper". Well done James - keep it up! Hi redarmy thank you for litsing the mod kills, What would be best though is working out the no of kills against amount of times spent moderating. Goofy could have banned all his 121 hits in 20 hours while james may have taken 100 hours to ban all 165 of his ############## take care zak redarmy11 10-24-06, 03:00 AM Hi Zak why not just repeat what Absane said above? Only kidding. Edit: actually, you're asking something different - the number of hours spent 'on the job'. Goofyfish. James R. Pseud0. Porfiry? Please submit your dates of appointment to the research team, as well as your average weekly moderating hours. Thankyou. Zakariya04 10-24-06, 03:05 AM Whoops sorry red army Did not rreally read Absane's thread? ################# take care zak Bells 10-24-06, 03:28 AM Outlandish was banned and for swearing in a situation that was apparently a joke between 2 people? :( *Sigh* Closing and removing threads because of a picture(s), swearing.. This just isn't going too well now is it? Moderating is one thing but over-policing and arbitrarily removing threads and banning for things such as swearing will no longer make this the place it once was. That plus the influx of idiotic new members we seem to have had of late can and may well lead to a mass exodus of members who have been here long enough to remember what it was once like in the earlier days of sciforums. I must admit I miss those days. The sciforums of lately is nothing like the sciforums of when I first joined in 2001. For one thing the moderation seems to have taken a wrong turn and the more moronic members of society seem to be joining by the bucketload in the last year or so. Zakariya04 10-24-06, 03:38 AM ....... and the more moronic members of society seem to be joining by the bucketload in the last year or so. Hi bells thank you for your post I hope this does not apply to all new members in the klast year or so. ################### take care zak redarmy11 10-24-06, 03:44 AM Hi bells, I hope you are well. I remember when Sciforums was email-based - just me and Porfiry smoking weed and talking about how cool it would be to live in space. I wish it could be like that again. :( ################### take care red Zakariya04 10-24-06, 04:14 AM Hi bells, I hope you are well. I remember when Sciforums was email-based - just me and Porfiry smoking weed and talking about how cool it would be to live in space. I wish it could be like that again. :( . LOL ################### take care redarmy11. To stay true to form Perhaps you need to sign off " #################### take care red " ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Take it ez zak redarmy11 10-24-06, 04:20 AM Say what? Zakariya04 10-24-06, 04:22 AM nice one red!!! redarmy11 10-24-06, 06:15 AM The results are in. Given the highly disappointing lack of information forwarded by the moderators regarding their appointment dates and hours worked, we decided to assess their ban ferocity as follows: 1. Calculate their total kill counts. 2. Take, as their start date, the date of their first kill. 3. Calculate how many days have elapsed from their start date to the present day, to give the number of days active (note that, although the forum has changed ownership, rumour has it that Porfiry is to stay on as an administrator. He's therefore deemed by the research team to be still active). 4. Divide their kill counts by their number of days active to give an overall average. Here are the final scores: Terminator ..... 1st Ban ...... Days Active ...... No. of Kills ........ Kills per Day James R ........ 22 Jun '04 .... 854 ................. 165 ................. 0.19 Pseud0 ......... 05 Oct '06 ...... 19 ..................... 3 ................. 0.16 goofyfish ....... 13 Apr '04 .... 924 ................. 121 ................. 0.13 Porfiry ........... 09 Jan '04 ... 1017 .................. 44 ................. 0.04 Now: I'd imagine that Porfiry has been banning people for a lot longer than the data suggests. I suspect that the records are incomplete but, on the basis of the information available, we can see that James once again emerges the clear winner, dispatching an average of 0.19 unlucky saps for every day that he's active. It seems that the much-fancied goofyfish has an undeserved reputation, trailing in a poor 3rd (with a laughable 0.13 kills per day) to our no-nonsense newcomer Pseudo, who is fighting James hard for the Termination title. However I have every confidence in my man, and feel sure that he'll continue to leave the others trailing in his wake. Go, Chopper! Nikelodeon 10-24-06, 06:21 AM Well I don't see how outlandish was banned but I was not. Seems strange. I'm dissapointed, if I were banned I might actually get some work done! John99 10-24-06, 06:27 AM Well I don't see how outlandish was banned but I was not. Seems strange. I'm dissapointed, if I were banned I might actually get some work done! He was banned cause he deserved it:D redarmy11 10-24-06, 06:28 AM Nickelodeon, can you post a link to the banning thread please? Ta. spuriousmonkey 10-24-06, 06:28 AM Reviewer comments: Dear author, thank you for this interesting manuscript. The dataset displayed in the manuscript is very interesting and of great value to science. However, that said I do have some small comments that will hopefully improve the paper. 1. I am missing a statistical analysis of the data. 2. There is no data on the racial background for the subjects. I'm afraid no racist website will ever quote your work without that kind of information. Nikelodeon 10-24-06, 06:33 AM Nickelodeon, can you post a link to the banning thread please? Ta. Nope. It's been erased from history. redarmy11 10-24-06, 06:35 AM :eek: So can you enlighten us as to exactly what he said then? Oniw17 10-24-06, 06:40 AM Yeah, what happened after his sister gave you genital warts? Nikelodeon 10-24-06, 06:41 AM :eek: So can you enlighten us as to exactly what he said then? Well I have the whole thing in my browser history. I'm annoyed actually, its pretty obvious reading it that it was all banter! If I repeat any of it here I'll probably get banned!? It was all in response to ripleofdeath saying: flaming and off topic posting seems normal now. abusive personaly directed off topic comments. and yet i have one of my posts removed in a thread because i posted the number 3 with some pictures... was not abusive at all. did not insult anyone... but what happens with insulting personaly abusive off topic posts ? they seem to be left on the threads... what is going on with the site ????? redarmy11 10-24-06, 06:42 AM Yeah, what happened after his sister gave you genital warts? I doused them liberally with TCP and they'd cleared up by the next morning. But anyway, can anyone tell me what... oh. Nikelodeon 10-24-06, 06:43 AM Yeah, what happened after his sister gave you genital warts? Nothing. That was his last post. I didn't have time to respond. Then someone posted a picture of a semi-naked dude eating a banana. How random?!! God I love this place. redarmy11 10-24-06, 06:44 AM What was the thread? Nikelodeon 10-24-06, 06:45 AM The one titled " wtf happened to moderators ?" Oniw17 10-24-06, 06:58 AM That's so...weird. phonetic 10-24-06, 10:49 AM My post in here with the semi nude banana eating man did get deleted, just like I thought it would. Let's see if it happens again. http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/5374/bananaph3.jpg --- Moderator note: User has been banned for 3 days for posting the image contained in the link, overriding a previous moderator deletion of the same image. The next ban will be considerably longer if it is required. Once again, I remind users that sciforums is not a porn site. Theoryofrelativity 10-24-06, 11:05 AM I know you guys say 'it was only banter' but maybe the new owners don't want this type of 'banter' anymore. Our veg sex thread would perhaps recieve the same treatment under new rule. I personally find threads disappearing without a trace and random bannings very arousing............grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Theoryofrelativity 10-24-06, 11:08 AM we can see that James once again emerges the clear winner, dispatching an average of 0.19 unlucky saps for every day that he's active. our no-nonsense newcomer Pseudo, who is fighting James hard for the Termination title. However I have every confidence in my man, and feel sure that he'll continue to leave the others trailing in his wake. Go, Chopper! Phwoooooooooooooarrrrrrrrrr, seeing it in figures like this is just.........................oh one han de typ ing, is har d Roman 10-24-06, 03:04 PM Reviewer comments: Dear author, thank you for this interesting manuscript. The dataset displayed in the manuscript is very interesting and of great value to science. However, that said I do have some small comments that will hopefully improve the paper. 1. I am missing a statistical analysis of the data. 2. There is no data on the racial background for the subjects. I'm afraid no racist website will ever quote your work without that kind of information. Ha. draqon 10-24-06, 04:35 PM I think goofyfish is the badass of mods. I think he is more willing to ban than James R. Those two play good cop/bad cop. James tries to give people a chance and just warn them. Goofy will kick the shit out of you. if that was the case than goofyfish would be the top mod for bannings and James R. the second. Clearly stats speak who is indeed who... invert_nexus 10-24-06, 07:12 PM My post in here with the semi nude banana eating man did get deleted, just like I thought it would. Let's see if it happens again. Just so you know, I was referring to this thread being deleted as far as my cutting out goes. It's not too uncommon for racy pics to be deleted. The banana boy pic is kinda stupid to be deleted as it doesn't really show anything but a guy eating a banana, but it's not enough to make me leave. Although. I'm getting antzy. Nikelodeon 10-25-06, 02:07 AM Moderator note: User has been banned for 3 days for posting the image contained in the link, overriding a previous moderator deletion of the same image. The next ban will be considerably longer if it is required. Once again, I remind users that sciforums is not a porn site. I didn't think the thread was deleted for that image, I thought it was because of the mock flamewar between me and outlandish? Oniw17 10-25-06, 02:11 AM Maybe the deletion earlier on this thread, I think the first page. Nikelodeon 10-25-06, 02:13 AM Oh I get it now. Rebellious lot ..... outlandish 10-26-06, 03:04 PM Outlandish brings it on himself. All he ever does is pick fights. rubbish, I never go out of my way to "pick fights", and besides you missed the crux of the matter which was nick and I were being ironic, only the mods somehow only saw fit to ban me. oh well. Nikelodeon 10-26-06, 03:07 PM I was going to whoop your ass anyway. draqon 10-26-06, 03:08 PM Outlandish brings it on to others. All he ever does is makes peace. <-not to be taken seriously outlandish 10-26-06, 03:11 PM I know you guys say 'it was only banter' but maybe the new owners don't want this type of 'banter' anymore. Our veg sex thread would perhaps recieve the same treatment under new rule. I personally find threads disappearing without a trace and random bannings very arousing............grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr what about members disappearing for 3 days without warning....do you find that arousing?? outlandish 10-26-06, 03:12 PM I was going to whoop your ass anyway. you just concentrate on clearing those genital warts kiddo.... draqon 10-26-06, 03:13 PM If someone will dissapear will he/she find it arousing him/herself? If someone will be aroused will he/she dissapear? ... outlandish 10-27-06, 03:37 PM Why was Abdullathebomber banned? :confused: why the interest in abdulla? Also, I think it isn' asking too much for an explaination as to: 1) why i was banned, and not nick aswell. Even if we are to accept that the ironic nature of the posts between nick and I was not picked up on, both of us were guilty of swearing. So why was I singled out? 2) why the lack of consistency in the decision? 3) why was I not warned of the ban? I await a response to the above questions by the mod concerned. Nikelodeon 10-27-06, 03:53 PM 3) why was I not warned of the ban? You didnt get a warning? :confused: Thats not good. Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 04:17 PM what about members disappearing for 3 days without warning....do you find that arousing?? phwaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrr indeed I do though3 days is a little short, and I prefer long to short outlandish 10-27-06, 04:45 PM phwaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrr indeed I do though3 days is a little short, and I prefer long to short oh god you don't know how hard I'm trying to refrain from anwering that blatant double entendre...... damit woman! stop teasing! outlandish 10-27-06, 04:47 PM You didnt get a warning? :confused: Thats not good. hey nick no biggie. yeh we can sit here and get all high and mighty about it, but 3 days in the can didn't do me any harm. keepin' it real baby, keepin' it real. Nikelodeon 10-27-06, 04:51 PM You deserved 3 years. :D Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 04:51 PM oh god you don't know how hard I'm trying to refrain from anwering that blatant double entendre...... damit woman! stop teasing! hard ay? mmm nah, don't respond, it may result in 6 days in the can! outlandish 10-27-06, 05:11 PM hard ay? mmm nah, don't respond, it may result in 6 days in the can! OMG...talk about freudian slip! and trust a woman to find it! Damn you're good. yep you're right, better not respond it'll just get too nasty. I'm off to take a cold shower. outlandish 10-27-06, 05:12 PM You deserved 3 years. :D man...imagine how much that would turn TOR on. the mind boggles. Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 05:18 PM man...imagine how much that would turn TOR on. the mind boggles. why three yrs when it could last for infinity, imagine 'lasting' for infinity? :bugeye: outlandish 10-27-06, 05:31 PM why three yrs when it could last for infinity, imagine 'lasting' for infinity? :bugeye: translation: I wish you weren't here outlandish (please somebody ban him for good) ??:( Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 05:34 PM translation: I wish you weren't here outlandish (please somebody ban him for good) ??:( alternatively, more double entendre's lasting for infinity 'lasting' outlandish 10-27-06, 05:36 PM alternatively, more double entendre's lasting for infinity 'lasting' I know, I know, but: 1) I refrained from rising to the bait, as it'd only get me all hot n' bothered;) 2) I was playing the "pathetic" angle....can't you hear the violins in the background? Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 05:43 PM I know, I know, but: 1) I refrained from rising to the bait, as it'd only get me all hot n' bothered;) 2) I was playing the "pathetic" angle....can't you hear the violins in the background? pathetic is not sexy, I have not time for pathetic, yuk peuk, vomit outlandish 10-27-06, 05:47 PM pathetic is not sexy, I have not time for pathetic, yuk peuk, vomit true, but it can be if it's done in the right way and at the right time for the right reasons. Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 05:49 PM true, but it can be if it's done in the right way and at the right time for the right reasons. never grrrrrrrrr I'm all out of the 'mood' now, gonna have to go to bed with my coco NOTE 'coco' does not contain a typo outlandish 10-27-06, 05:55 PM never grrrrrrrrr I'm all out of the 'mood' now, gonna have to go to bed with my coco NOTE 'coco' does not contain a typo never grrrrrrrrr lol, well evidently you haven't yet encountered an expert. I'm all out of the 'mood' now, *sigh* I'd love to get you back in the mood, but that would definately result in a permanent ban. so I'll let you enjoy your cocoa, I'm sure it's hot and strong, and will keep you warm all night;) sweet dreams. Theoryofrelativity 10-27-06, 05:59 PM lol, well evidently you haven't yet encountered an expert. *sigh* I'd love to get you back in the mood, but that would definately result in a permanent ban. so I'll let you enjoy your cocoa, I'm sure it's hot and strong, and will keep you warm all night;) sweet dreams. night night x geodesic 10-27-06, 06:05 PM NOTE 'coco' does not contain a typoIf there's no typo, might we be talking about a Coco related to the sea? phonetic 10-28-06, 12:19 PM Well, that was an enjoyable 3 day break. I'm feeling refreshed and ready for anything. :) Nikelodeon 10-28-06, 12:20 PM Did you get a life instead? What was it like? outlandish 10-28-06, 12:37 PM Well, that was an enjoyable 3 day break. I'm feeling refreshed and ready for anything. :) didn't even notice you were gone. phonetic 10-28-06, 12:47 PM Did you get a life instead? What was it like? Not really. I just watched tv instead. Didn't even notice you were gone Up yours too mate :( outlandish 10-28-06, 12:53 PM hey phone, is it true you guys deep fry mars bars?? |