Please follow the link. I know there has to be a reason why I don't seem to be able to find a plane or parts thereof. Maybe doctored photos?

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

I recall that on 9/11, CNN spoke with a pilot who lived in the DC area, and whose home had a view of the Pentagon. The gentleman was on the ground and at home that day, and I recall that he said it appeared the plane hit the ground before it hit the Pentagon.

This would give us some suggestion toward any number of possibilities, yet I was intrigued by the question about the landscaping, and the idea that the lawn was undamaged.

By and large, though, what it seems that people are forgetting when examining the Pentagon attack is that the Pentagon is designed to withstand a hell of a lot. Only the outer ring was damaged? I'm not surprised. It's designed to withstand a war.

Is there no video of the impact? Nothing? I can't recall now, as it's been just long enough and I can't sort out memory at this point.

The notion that the plane hit the ground just outside the Pentagon was shot down (heh) by someone of official status in the early going, but I still lean toward it as a possibility; intelligence, as we know, was a mess.

The site presented gathers its images from available US military photos, and I'm inclined to treat that data set as I do any other; have we seen truly representative photos?

Or so goes my first survey of this.

I'm inclined to favor conspiracy ideas, but not ones so blatant. We're talking about cajones the size of Los Angeles if we're looking for so naked a setup. I don't doubt that nefarious information will arise and the situation resolve to be not what the public believes it to be. At the worst (e.g. US involvement or consent to trigger a military action) we might be looking at a bomb on the plane. This would explain a number of things. Fly the plane toward the Pentagon, make the approach, set off the bomb, disintigrate in a rain of fire, and that makes the debris harder to identify (e.g. sheriff's question). At it's best, I think we might see the CIA admitting that they had other plans afoot that took precedent over standard security procedures. In other words, they gambled and lost.

They're quite the interesting points, and I haven't seen them assembled as such until now. But I have no real explanation to offer.

thanx,
Tiassa :cool:

I'll probably catch some Hell on this one, but here goes.
The only proof I have is my own memory of the events. I remember, quite
vividly, seeing sections of the tail, of the plane, sticking out from the rubble.
I also remember the lawn being torn up. I feel the pictures have been altered. I was home, that day, watching in horror.
I wouldn't fall for this crap, & I'm an idiot.:eek: :cool: