View Full Version : Collapsing Gravity


Ozolnyex
11-16-05, 07:44 AM
Collapsing gravity, the result of sophisticated sphere rotation, maybe new technology.

Take a look at this

www.spheremotion.com

username:spheremotion
password:ant1gr4vity

AntonK
11-16-05, 08:18 AM
First off it looks like you just created an account to push a website. Because of that I should ignore it. But, Ill give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that maybe you genuinely want a discussion of the ideas on the site.

I've actually read about this theory before, its not new. In fact, I like this theory (in so much as I find it interesting)... but this is mostly because I have a very weak physics understanding. I'm assuming others can poke a lot of holes in this theory (I'd like to hear some comments). One of my major issues with this theory and similar is that it doesn't add anything new to current theories. What kind of predictions (preferabbly verifiable ones) does this theory make that others do not?

-AntonK

CANGAS
11-16-05, 03:35 PM
COULD NOT GET INTO LINK. EXPLAIN THEORY BRIEFLY HERE?

Ozolnyex
11-17-05, 12:29 PM
First off it looks like you just created an account to push a website. Because of that I should ignore it. But, Ill give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that maybe you genuinely want a discussion of the ideas on the site.

I've actually read about this theory before, its not new. In fact, I like this theory (in so much as I find it interesting)... but this is mostly because I have a very weak physics understanding. I'm assuming others can poke a lot of holes in this theory (I'd like to hear some comments). One of my major issues with this theory and similar is that it doesn't add anything new to current theories. What kind of predictions (preferabbly verifiable ones) does this theory make that others do not?

-AntonK


In fact this is not a theory. This is a real idea of how to anihilate an effect of spacetime what is the gravitational attraction by reshaping spacetime inside the sphere. The prediction is when the spacetime inside the sphere is flattened, there will be no force in the universe that could move the device in any other way but along the plain. It means You can hang up any mass on such a device, the only limit is a limit of structural strength of the device itself.

Every idea is verified by the experiment, the device is not so complicated not to be verified.

allisone417
11-18-05, 02:01 PM
the username and password works...

dont forget the numbers in the password ant(1)gr(4)vity -( )

CANGAS
11-18-05, 11:14 PM
Tell me, how sussessful have you been personally in making anything rotate around more than one axis simultaneously? As soon as a second rotation is initiated, the two rotations combine into a singular "component" rotation.

In actual practice, the combination, due to gyroscopic reactions, can be violent, so be wary when you actually try it.

Ozolnyex
11-21-05, 12:47 PM
There will be two controllable rotations, because of two axis relative to each other, not one.

It could be dangerous untill You find out proper proportions of speeds on each axis when the plain is formed inside the sphere.

CANGAS
11-21-05, 01:25 PM
I was thinking only of a free sphere, such as a planet, and overlooked a sphere in multiple mountings, even though I mentioned such in the same post.

What was I thinking?

While I still claim that free sphere will not rotate upon two distinct axis, perhaps my arguement is semantic and so is not worth persuing.

I certainly agree that a mounted sphere could be so manipulated. And it is worth repeating, even a small gyroscope can suddenly execute a surprisingly large and violent reaction.

eternal sunshine
11-22-05, 06:42 AM
I view gravity, space and matter as one and the same.
Create knots in space and you have matter which distorts the space around it causing the effect of gravity.
Imagine space as a 4 dimensional net, or open cell sponge. Eventually as the universe reaches it's full expansion, matter will cease to exist and there will only be left the memory of it causing the 'strings' to hum.

Ozolnyex
11-22-05, 12:27 PM
Actaully if You add another axis to a free sphere there will be still two rotations but very complicated, both axis will be moving along their own path, dependant on each other, in some sircumstances they can even merge.

We could realy think about this type of rotation as a "one", in this caes because of abscence of any stable axis.

The question is how to initiate secondary rotation on a free sphere and what effect will it cause?