This is a science forum, supposedly. IAC doesn't even make any attempts at science. He's really lame, a liar, intellectually dishonest, and willfully ignorant. He preaches is "theory" in virtually every thread.


Would that be any reason to banish him forever?

I was just gonna say the same thing about you.

Yes.

Yes.

Seconded.

I'm holding my own against the malicious Darwinite yappers here, and you guys just hate it, so if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Does anyone actually want this guy around?

I do.

I'm holding my own against the malicious Darwinite yappers here, and you guys just hate it, so if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

But that's what upsets me; you aren't. You aren't holding anything. You don't even have a logically sound argument!

You can't even remember what I've said for months and months, what is wrong with you?

You can't even remember what I've said for months and months, what is wrong with you?

Was it "goo morphed into you", "you're brain washed " "You can't even remember what I've said for months and months", or "what is wrong with you"?

That doesn't seem like a very strong position.

Well, at least you're consistent.

Ban threads are illegal. You can be sent to prison for them.

dont ban him, if people offend you put them on ignore?


peace.

Yeh, it worked great for Genji.

Ban threads are illegal. You can be sent to prison for them.

Effective immediately, SF Open Government is closed to all motions to ban users and all motions to take punitive action against moderators. Complaints about users can be made to moderators directly. Complaints about moderators can be made to me directly.

This forum has proven to be divisive, ineffective, and has taken the focus of members and moderators away from the core discussion forums here.

1. Mastah P ain't mastah no more.

2. This is merely a point of inquiry. I did not intend it as a motion, merely to elucidate if IAC's behavior would be grounds for punitive action.

What does your failure to recall what I've said for months and months have to do with my behavior?

What does your failure to recall what I've said for months and months have to do with my behavior?

You've said the same thing for months and months.
Nothing.

Okie dokie.

Roman

why do you want to surround yourself with yes men who agree with everything you say? How dull would life be! Difference of opinion and disagreement facilitate progress and variety.

If we all liked chicken soup we'd never have gotton tomato!

one trick pony

Creative Fossil, that's the ticket.

I don't like tomato soup.

Roman

why do you want to surround yourself with yes men who agree with everything you say?

Where'd I want to do that?

Difference of opinion and disagreement facilitate progress and variety.

Dialogue facilitates progress and variety. IAC is unable to engage in any sort of discussion or even construct an argument. His transgression is not disagreeing with the established order, but an inability to think. He actually refuses to use his reason.

He's braindead, and he likes it that way.

People who don't like tomato soup are in the minority.

People who don't like tomato soup are in the minority.

Does that make my opinion less valid or noteworthy?

I was just gonna say the same thing about you.I agree IAC. Look at the super troll author! He's just a cheesy immature heckler. With SF being his only social outlet I sense he feels the need to direct attention away from his lame self.

To one raven and Genji, not at all.

I don't like tomato soup.
Moi non plus.

I agree IAC. Look at the super troll author!

Hey queer, why don't you stuff a tampon in it?

He's just a cheesy immature heckler.

Then what's got your panties in a twist, mister grown up?
Oh, that's right, the estrogen.
Why aren't I on your ignore list? You probably get off on pimply, overweight losers making fun of you, huh.

With SF being his only social outlet I sense he feels the need to direct attention away from his lame self.

Says the gay janitor. hahaahhaaa.

Anyway, the issue here isn't what IAC says; I don't care about that. It's how he says it. Is his behavior at all acceptable here at Sciforums?

Two mods have already said that no, it's not. I'm curious what the other users have to say.

Whatever.
I'm going to the beach. This thread better be at least five pages long and locked before I get back, or else :mad:

Hey queer, why don't you stuff a tampon in it?



Then what's got your panties in a twist, mister grown up?
Oh, that's right, the estrogen.
Why aren't I on your ignore list? You probably get off on pimply, overweight losers making fun of you, huh.



Says the gay janitor. hahaahhaaa.

Anyway, the issue here isn't what IAC says; I don't care about that. It's how he says it. Is his behavior at all acceptable here at Sciforums?

Two mods have already said that no, it's not. I'm curious what the other users have to say.More playground taunts. Stickth an stonth may break my bonth but worth will never hurt me.

Ok, Roman's gone now, what a turd-sniffer!

More playground taunts. Stickth an stonth may break my bonth but worth will never hurt me.

Then ignore them, and read what I'm really saying.

99% of IAC's posts are one sentence long (seriously, check them out), and 95% of them contain no scientific information. Yes, that is grounds for permanent banning.

"No scientific information," are you crazy? My posts are chalk full of info these guys have never heard of, give it a rest NDS.

Weird

IAC, you are pathetic. Don't you realize that anyone can merely click on your name, then click on the "Find all posts by IceAgeCivilizations" link and view your stupidity?

some accuses him of one line posts then posts their own one line posts, WITH NO SCIENTIFiC CONTENT!---

Thanks for that, Oh Great One.

Here are IAC's last 25 posts. See how scientific they are?

1. Roman says he's straight, but he's so disingenuous, I don't know what to think.
2. "No scientific information," are you crazy? My posts are chalk full of info these guys have never heard of, give it a rest NDS.
3. Well that's good, 'cause if you'd said no, I was gonna tell you that Roman wants to date you.
4. Hey Nicholas1M7, if you were out camping with the fellas, got drunk, and woke up the next morning with your pants down around your ankles, and grass stains on your knees, would you tell anybody when you got back to town?
5. Skin and Sam deleted 'em.
6. Ok, Roman's gone now, what a turd-sniffer!
7. To one raven and Genji, not at all.
8. People who don't like tomato soup are in the minority.
9. Yeh, we know Med Woman.
10. Creative Fossil, that's the ticket.
11. Because they are Skin, James R, and Sam.
12. Okie dokie.
13. Rod Serling was a Dartmouth guy.
14. Shoot, there's four right here.
15. What does your failure to recall what I've said for months and months have to do with my behavior?
16. Thousands of scientists agree with my interpretation, sorry 'bout that.
17. Yeh, it worked great for Genji.
18. Already did, your score just went up.
19. You don't give the time of day to other "retarded" people, why just me?
20. Well, at least you're consistent.
21. I'd thank you for the compliment, but your are disingenuous.
22. NDS can tell you.
23. You can't even remember what I've said for months and months, what is wrong with you?
24. It's a little bit bigger, not much.
25. I do.

IMO, the annoying people are interesting sometimes.

They are at least fun to watch

He's really lame, a liar, intellectually dishonest, and willfully ignorant. He preaches is "theory" in virtually every thread.



What is that, the revised list of qualifications for a discussion forum moderator?

I don't like tomato soup.

you must conform.


peace.

99% of IAC's posts are one sentence long (seriously, check them out), and 95% of them contain no scientific information. Yes, that is grounds for permanent banning.


Admittedly, the sheer volume of The Great Man's posts can be discouraging to certain idealogues who stubbornly cling to their misguided beliefs. Being unable to refute alternative viewpoints, said idealogues resort to attacking the man instead of the issues. This thread is a clear example of such a hapless practice.

With respect to the "one-liners," it is readily apparent that "one line" is often all it takes to hold up the mirror to and magnify the folly of much of the foolishness that is strewn about this prestigious, august discussion forum. The Great Man's tenacity and graciousness in these matters should be applauded, not condemned.

You're delusional. IAC's debating style amounts to putting his fingers in his ears and going, "la,la,la,la,la, I can't hear you.".

I hate that IAC passed my postcount.:mad: Bastard. Of course I'll perma stall on the 30th. Still it makes me cranky.

You're delusional. IAC's debating style amounts to putting his fingers in his ears and going, "la,la,la,la,la, I can't hear you.".

Lol, that is spot on, get rid of him.

He deserves a permaban for having a weak chin. I shall not say this is caused by a long history of inbreeding because I have no proof of this, but still.

http://www.iceagecivilizations.com/art/Jim70x95.jpg

I think all you people are forgetting about the 'bald people with moustaches' quota.

I also think he looks like he might be a really nice fella, or possibly a serial killer. Thus, I vote 'nay'.

When I was a moderator I was just mainly deleting his posts. Maybe it would be smarter to delete him entirely.

Solution: Ignore list.

the ignore list is for ghey people.

As are ban threads. I always suspected Roman was ghey.

well, he definitely looks ghey and he always brags about how much sex he has with .... women! That's typical of a gay man who hasn't come out of the closet yet.

I think we can safely say that IAC has come out of the closet though a long time ago.

Roman

why do you want to surround yourself with yes men who agree with everything you say? How dull would life be! Difference of opinion and disagreement facilitate progress and variety.

If we all liked chicken soup we'd never have gotton tomato!

i publicly disagree with everything roman has ever said on this forum on mere principle, and he isnt calling for me to be permabanned.
in fact, we get on quite well.

change your snotwuh to 'going to bed with roman'

change your snotwuh to 'going to bed with roman'

id rather not. he threatened to burn my cat alive once.
its just not sexy to murder someone's pets.

I noticed I still have IACs quotes in my sciforums memory. Let's add them here. I first thought of reporting them all, but then got lazy.

Reported for being a trollie wollie.

So Roman, you retained nothing?

Ok then, slime mold to mole.

There are no decimals in the Bible of which I'm aware.

Roman, after months of me explaining the GFM, and with you now indicating no knowledge of what I've said, you are obviously just jacking around, so I hope you have a real good time.

You retained nothing, sad to see.

Roman, I thought you are at least somewhat intellectually honest, but since you feign total ignorance of what I've been saying for several months, you are just a clown looking to be sassy, so carry on.

Since you feign ignorance of what I've said, talking to you is like talking to a hedgepost.

Maybe you can go look for them, I've answered hundreds of questions, yours included, so have fun!

You can't honestly repeat anything which I've said in answer to hundreds of questions on all these topics, so you just look the fool Roman.

Carry on, you are disingenous.

You are "out to lunch," but it seems to be common around here, misrepresent the opponent's positions, transparently sophomoric, and yet, it passes muster among the yakking Darwinists who have no viable position to defend, hence their inane attempts to do so.

shut up.

i would if you would listen to our foreskin for a change. Do you want mustard on your pizza or not?

i would if you would listen to our foreskin for a change. Do you want mustard on your pizza or not?

pineapples.
sorry, i was on the phone, and i put a clamp on the base of the skin before i talk on the phone. you feel the need to "yell" too often.

Admittedly, the sheer volume of The Great Man's posts can be discouraging to certain idealogues who stubbornly cling to their misguided beliefs. Being unable to refute alternative viewpoints, said idealogues resort to attacking the man instead of the issues. This thread is a clear example of such a hapless practice.

With respect to the "one-liners," it is readily apparent that "one line" is often all it takes to hold up the mirror to and magnify the folly of much of the foolishness that is strewn about this prestigious, august discussion forum. The Great Man's tenacity and graciousness in these matters should be applauded, not condemned.

Nutter, instead of making a complete fool out of yourself, why don't you browse through some of the other threads on this site involving Old vs. Young Earth. You'll see that I, along with many others, have provided paragraphs of analysis and information and many a links to outside sources which support it. You'll also note that IAC barely ever even attempts to refute these alternative viewpoints. Instead, he throws a one-liner out there which contains no argument and is usually a lame insult (with some kind of abbreviated word with an apostrophe to sound southern, lol).

When confronted with an viewpoint which goes against his, IAC merely resorts to evasive and insultive tactics which prove his lack of any argument. He doesn't put the time in to provide an adequate response and show the respect for the thread like the rest of us do.

Now, nutter, if you would have browsed through these other threads and done the research first instead of jumping to conclusions because of your obvious crush on IAC, then you wouldn't have made a complete fool out of yourself. Thanks for your thoughts though.

I gotta admitt, I don't really come accross any of IAC's posts. Perhaps this is due in part to him being more interested in the science areas than I am. I would hardly seek to argue a fundamental principle like how old the planet is, in the end what's it matter?

The truth is, it really doesn't matter. If IAC wasn't as arrogant and full of shit as he is, maybe no one would even bother to refute his ideas about the age of the earth.

Sciforums memory? What's that?

I disagree with any form of banning; regardless of his posts its important for him to be exposed to other points of view; its unfair to expect anyone to accept or understand an alternate point of view about any subject without some time for consideration. Even if he does not benefit, there may be others who read this forum and who may learn something significant.

Besides, if everyone here agrees on all scientific points of view, there would be nothing to debate about.

In addition, compared to some of the nasty know-it-alls here, he is a nice guy. You might learn something from him too.

In addition, compared to some of the nasty know-it-alls here, he is a nice guy. You might learn something from him too.

I learned the symptoms of delusion from him

I learned from spur and several others here how manicly defensive Darwinists are, it's as if someone stole their cookies.

no problem

I learned I need another coffee.

I learned from spur and several others here how manicly defensive Darwinists are, it's as if someone stole their cookies.

You really should quit provoking people; thats my job here.:mad: :poke:

I'm provoked. Another kitten please and plenty of chili this time.

http://mrtea.all.fivegeeks.net/old/kitten.jpg

No time to cook, here's some fast food.

I'll take a bowl of Darwinite goo.

Doesn't exist anymore. It required a reducing environment with no oxygen.

Maybe at the bottom of the Black Sea?

The truth is, it really doesn't matter. If IAC wasn't as arrogant and full of shit as he is, maybe no one would even bother to refute his ideas about the age of the earth.

lol

http://mrtea.all.fivegeeks.net/old/kitten.jpg

No time to cook, here's some fast food.

Yesssssssssssssss here u an I agree, this animal is meant for eating :L

The reason you guys try to refute the Global Flood Model is because it makes sense, if it was nonsensical, you woudn't bother, "arrogant" or not.

The reason you guys try to refute the Global Flood Model is because it makes sense, if it was nonsensical, you woudn't bother
What nonsense.

Does anyone actually want this guy around?
Yes.

The reason you guys try to refute the Global Flood Model is because it makes sense, if it was nonsensical, you woudn't bother, "arrogant" or not.
That may be the single most bizarre piece of 'logic' you've come up with, IceAgeCivilizations.

Tell how you think that is supposedly bizarre.

Tell how you think that is supposedly bizarre.

I beg your pardon?

"Bizarre piece of logic," what is your reasoning for making that statement?

IAC: So that must be why I don't bother refuting your nonsense all of the time. I know it's incorrect. ;)

Meanwhile you readily make statements voicing against anything others say that opposes the flood. Even debating occasionally.

You've just admitted to your idea being false. By your own poor rationality.

Many disagree with you, and more and more all the time.

Many disagree with you, and more and more all the time.
On this forum?

Do a poll.

I don't find Ice Age Civilization or any of you threatening enough to simply...ban for no reason. I think the thread maker may need to freeze out.

Internet conversation should not cause stress.

IAC is merely annoying. Hence our want for a ban. Similarly, that blog-feminist-hippy runs a close second to IAC. She was already perma-banned before.

I disagree with any form of banning; regardless of his posts its important for him to be exposed to other points of view; its unfair to expect anyone to accept or understand an alternate point of view about any subject without some time for consideration. Even if he does not benefit, there may be others who read this forum and who may learn something significant.

Besides, if everyone here agrees on all scientific points of view, there would be nothing to debate about.

In addition, compared to some of the nasty know-it-alls here, he is a nice guy. You might learn something from him too.

I refer you, and others who hold your mistaken assumptions, to this (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=66798).

IAC has no interest in learning. He's actually incapable of it.

Thanks for posting that Roman, good job.

I refer you, and others who hold your mistaken assumptions, to this (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=66798).

IAC has no interest in learning. He's actually incapable of it.

You can read his mind too?:rolleyes:

He thinks I got my respectable vocabulary by injection.

He thinks I got my respectable vocabulary by injection.

Do you have a slow connection or something? For a writer, you don't exert yourself to write much.

Seems whenever I write a nice longer one, it gets deleted or removed to some remote outpost. But I think I get my points across. Plus, with all the jackals, I have to post many replies.

I think the thread maker may need to freeze out.



The "thread maker" needs to acquire copies of IAC's publications and prayerfully study the contents thereof. As should many other members of the ignoranti.

A little bit bit of study and contemplation goes a long way in purging the odious indoctrination force-fed during one's youth. We hereby thank IAC for boldly taking a stand in the name of truth.

"The ignoranti," gotta love it, I still think Nutter would be a great President, President Nutter.

Seems whenever I write a nice longer one, it gets deleted or removed to some remote outpost. But I think I get my points across. Plus, with all the jackals, I have to post many replies.


Perhaps if you did not respond to everyone and respond more fully to those who are willing to discuss?

The little yippers need to be dealt with too.

Point proven, Sam...

Point proven, Sam...

I think the amount of attention he gets is the point. With all the lamentations you hear, you'd think people would be less likely to encourage him.

Point taken, Saiyyadati.

I refer you, and others who hold your mistaken assumptions, to this (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=66798).

IAC has no interest in learning. He's actually incapable of it.

There is nothing wrong with being ignorant.
There is everything wrong with chosing to be ignorant.
Arrogance about your selective ignorance is simply unforgivable.

Point taken, Saiyyadati.

This forum is filled with pseudo-intellectuals who sit around like old men wishing for the good old days, in-between exchanging lascivious gossip and getting off on righteous voyeurism about the bad bad boys in the here and now.:p

Exactly. But when I was young it wasn't like that...

Perhaps if you did not respond to everyone and respond more fully to those who are willing to discuss?


We all agree that the burden placed upon IAC's broad shoulders is vast and onerous. By graciously engaging "everyone," IAC is helping them in the long run by maintaining their interest in a given topic and perhaps helping them come to an understanding at some point.

International treasures such as IAC are rare indeed. We should count our blessings and blissfully avail ourselves of this most precious human resource.

We all agree that the burden placed upon IAC's broad shoulders is vast and onerous. By graciously engaging "everyone," IAC is helping them in the long run by maintaining their interest in a given topic and perhaps helping them come to an understanding at some point.

International treasures such as IAC are rare indeed. We should count our blessings and blissfully avail ourselves of this most precious human resource.

FYI, I disagree entirely with IAC's theories; however, that should not automatically make him liable for ostracism. I dislike any clannish promotion of groupthink.

Just clarifying my position.:)

FYI, I disagree entirely with IAC's theories; however, that should not automatically make him liable for ostracism. I dislike any clannish promotion of groupthink.

Just clarifying my position.:)

But such a method of social maintenance has been successfully implemented by egalitarian and band level societies for thousands of years. Indeed the very notion of "ostracism" derives from the word "ostraca," the broken bits of pottery that were used in ancient Athens to "vote" a citizen into exile.

But such a method of social maintenance has been successfully implemented by egalitarian and band level societies for thousands of years. Indeed the very notion of "ostracism" derives from the word "ostraca," the broken bits of pottery that were used in ancient Athens to "vote" a citizen into exile.

Yes and its been variously known as ex-communication, exile, solitary confinement, imprisonment, discrimination, racism etc in its various forms.

Do you know of any positive outcomes from any of these methods of social maintenance?

I would suggest some of the works of Kipling Williams for an insight on the effects of social exclusion and ostracism

http://www.amazon.com/Social-Outcast-Ostracism-Exclusion-Psychology/dp/184169424X/ref=sr_1_2/104-4862157-0245558?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1179431308&sr=1-2

Big difference between simply rejecting the community of someone, and actively working towards their harm like the inquisition.

Big difference between simply rejecting the community of someone, and actively working towards their harm like the inquisition.

IMO and also my experience, it is damaging to stifle any kind of debate, because:

1. it gives rise to conspiracy theories
2. it creates artificial victims
3. it conceals these points of view or gives them legitimacy among some people who are only insidiously exposed to them in a covert manner.

Debate is better than suppression.:shrug:

Debate would be nice.

Debate is better than suppression.

What debate?

We all agree that the burden placed upon IAC's broad shoulders is vast and onerous. By graciously engaging "everyone," IAC is helping them in the long run by maintaining their interest in a given topic and perhaps helping them come to an understanding at some point.

International treasures such as IAC are rare indeed. We should count our blessings and blissfully avail ourselves of this most precious human resource.

Satyr, is that you?

If Satyr is Nutter, I'll give Team Hillary a thousand bucks.

What debate?

The one y'all insist on having with him.;) :p

Exactly. But when I was young it wasn't like that...
It was like that when I joined.

Anyway, what was that about Porfiry not being quite in charge any more?

Porfiry sold this site for mega bucks. He's off on some island sipping rum.

Pffft. Porfiry wasn't even thought of when I was young.

Porfiry

Pffft. Porfiry wasn't even thought of when I was young.
You only joined in 2005, noob.

Now I want to know who the fuck pseud0 and Zox are. Are they also running experiments upon us innocent surfers?

Now I want to know who the fuck pseud0 and Zox are. Are they also running experiments upon us innocent surfers?
Zox is Zoran.

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=58528


pseud0 was El Comandante and was responsible for the ET guy

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1169671#post1169671

Which changed during the logo contest.

I like IAC. He is one of my top 10 guys here.;)

Ahh, thanks Nickelodeon.

(You do realise your being useful now? You'll have to post lots of sewage to make up for it)

So it seems that Sciforums got taken over by people with an agenda, who wished to make it the best science forums on the web rather than the endearingly anarchic place it used to be?* Interesting.

Mind you, I don't mind having a few more forum sections, although I;m not sure comparative religion is a science.


*And we still discussed a fair bit of science.

(You do realise your being useful now? You'll have to post lots of sewage to make up for it)
Yeah I'm a bit tired at the moment. Dont worry after a good nights sleep I'll have plenty of energy to defaecate everywhere soon.

Holy shit. Lighten up people

sure IAC spews some pretty useless shit, but cmon. there are plenty of members here who contribute absolutely nothing to conversations but stupid one liners that have no bearing on the argument. You just wanna permaban him because his shit is filled with Christian influences and mentions.

He's different in that regard but besides that, there are a good 4 or 5 IAC's on sciforums.

ban the fucker. and sandy too.

ban the fucker. and sandy too.

in all fairness, sandy hasnt done anything permaban worthy.

in all fairness, sandy hasnt done anything permaban worthy.

Except insulting humanity and jesus.

she's a witch queen....
of new orleans.

she's a witch queen....
of new orleans.

I think you need some kind of education to become a witch.

I think you need some kind of education to become a witch.

*shrug* not in louisiana.

ban the fucker. and sandy too.

:wtf:

What did I ever do to you? I haven't personally attacked you or anyone else. I don't call people here names.

There is a group here that has been antagonizing me since I got here. I'm not playing. I know the jig.

I have not insulted Jesus. I have defended His honor from multiple revilers/blasphemers. And being against illegal immigration and terrorism is NOT
insulting humanity.:rolleyes:

This is a science forum, supposedly.

...lame, a liar, intellectually dishonest, and willfully ignorant.

Would that be any reason to banish him forever?

If so, then we need to ban many a member here.

Yeah, like you, nic, and spurious who constantly antagonize/personally attack/cause strife/and spew venom at people you disagree with.

Yeah, like you, nic, and spurious who constantly antagonize/personally attack/cause strife/and spew venom at people you disagree with.

haha!
why is it always whining with you? i thought rightwingers coined the phrase "git 'er dun!"?

deal with it through the moderators if somebody breaks forum rules.

Yeah, like you, nic, and spurious who constantly antagonize/personally attack/cause strife/and spew venom at people you disagree with.

When was the last time you actually didn't tell a lie?

Can't remember, huh?

If your condition were a medical problem, I would retract everything. Is it?

Because it's constant and I don't need to go whining to the mods everytime I get attacked. I'd be there all day. People should know how to behave decently. Name-calling and personal attacking is childish and immature. I am guilty of doing it lately out of frustration. The same group (some of whom hit on me in PM,got rejected, and got REALLY p!ssed off!) keeps attacking and it's getting old.:mad:

IAC is a gentleman. I like him.

People should know how to behave decently.

When are you going to learn that?

Name-calling and personal attacking is childish and immature.

You are a bold-face liar and have been called on it a number of times. It isn't name calling, it's calling a spade a spade.

IAC is a gentleman. I like him.

Birds of a feather.

IAC is a gentleman. I like him.

Ya Jimmy is a nice guy.:)

I like IAC. He is one of my top 10 guys here.;)

*************
M*W: I understand he's looking for a cute, hot, sexy real chick who may look like Christie Brinkley. You two do have a lot in common.

Q- you calling me a liar over and over doesn't make it true. Just like your group calling me a racist doesn't make it true. I am a chick. I am a CCR. And I am hot. End of discussion.:D

I am a chick. I am a CCR. And I am hot. End of discussion.:D

Ok, we know. Drop it.

As soon as they quit calling me liar, telling me I am not a chick, I am not a conservative, not a Christian, and not a Republican. They're like freakin 2 year olds already. They don't let up. They go to PM. It's freakin ridiculous.:mad:

As soon as they quit calling me liar, telling me I am not a chick, I am not a conservative, not a Christian, and not a Republican. They're like freakin 2 year olds already. They don't let up. They go to PM. It's freakin ridiculous.:mad:

Post a REAL picture and most of us will leave you alone.

As soon as they quit calling me liar...

A rose is a rose is a rose...

It will be a cold day in hell that I will post a pic here. I'm tired of personal attacks etc. I'll just keep using Christie Brinkley avatars since I look just like her. (Only younger and cuter.)

It will be a cold day in hell that I will post a pic here. I'm tired of personal attacks etc. I'll just keep using Christie Brinkley avatars since I look just like her. (Only younger and cuter.)

And with more moles, and blemishes, and freckles, and less hair, etc.

It will be a cold day in hell that I will post a pic here. I'm tired of personal attacks etc.

Well then you are just going to have to live with us calling you a fake. Any old fat guy can join a forum and pretend to be a hot chick. I have seen it MANY times on other forums. Their called "theme trolls."

And with more moles, and blemishes, and freckles, and less hair, etc.

...snaggle-toothed, wall-eyed, bad breath, toe-jam...

...snaggle-toothed, wall-eyed, bad breath, toe-jam...

Behave.:bugeye: