George Bush just said Saddam "must disarm... Or we will lead a coalition to disarm him".
So, let's see if I've got this right. Bush will go to war to take guns off someone who doesn't want to go to war.
Banshee
10-08-02, 02:32 AM
Well, that is bush's right. He is allowed to attack preventive, no matter whether they're right or wrong. That was decided by the great government almighty of the united states.
Although there are a few voices against, or at the least asking questions, bush can act all by himself if necessarry. No new evidence of actual, present WMD in Iraq. In the US on the otherhand there are tons of the stuff available.
The US army is there to free the people of Iraq. The US are the friend of the people of Iraq and want to set everybody free. Only thing they want is to disarm Saddam and bring him to trial for crimes against humanity and war crimes. It is a peace mission.
Yes, right...
grazzhoppa
10-08-02, 06:35 AM
I don't think he'll have much of a coalition this time around, nothing like 1991.