Bush Plans to Fire Fitzgerald

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mikasa11, Aug 7, 2005.

  1. mikasa11 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    258

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    http://www.tomflocco.com

    BUSH PLANS TO FIRE PROSECUTOR:
    Bush plans to fire prosecutor as federal agents prepare to arrest him

    by Tom Flocco

    Washington -- August 7, 2005 -- TomFlocco.com -- Sunday morning online editions of Newsweek and Time are reporting that the President is planning to fire Chicago's U.S. Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and replace him with a Bush classmate/Skull and Bonesman from Yale.

    Following on the heels of these reports, we have learned from U.S. intelligence sources that federal agents are prepared to immediately arrest Mr. Bush if he fires Fitzgerald and seeks to obstruct justice and commit additional treasonous acts regarding ongoing grand jury proceedings against his administration and himself

    For all of you bonehead repubs who don't know who Patrick Fitzgerald is, he's the special prosecuter for the Valerie Plame case.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Neildo Gone Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,306
    Oh, now this is interesting.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    And also, why is that website forbidden to be viewed and where can the Time and Newsweek articles be found? I'm searching the sites and can't find anything.

    - N
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Cottontop3000 Death Beckoned Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,959
    I couldn't find ANYTHING on Newsweek or Time either. Guess we will just have to wait and see.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Cottontop3000 Death Beckoned Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,959
    Are you fuckers checking here to see what we say?! Fuck Bush!
     
  8. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    As far as I can see it's all hearsay, unsubtantiate allegations, unfounded accusations and ....frankly, bullshit. It's just propoganda in the hate Bush campaign, nothing more.

    Baron Max
     
  9. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    That would be too obviously Nixon.

    We don't use unsubstantiated information to oppose Bush, we don't need to.
     
  10. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Yeah, Spidergoat, I can see that. But do you think that it's wise to do so? I mean, do you take all unsubstantiated accusations about everyone in the same way?

    Or do you just have a hard-on about Bush, so ANYTHING is "right" with you? And is that a good way to be?

    What's your views gonna' be when you become president of the USA? Will you still feel the same?

    Baron Max
     
  11. Neildo Gone Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,306
    What a shame, I was hoping for those allegations to be true.

    He was being sarcastic, heh.

    - N
     
  12. Hurricane Angel I am the Metatron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    471
    Baron Max should be banned from this place. No joke.

    As far as Bush "choosing" to do anything is bullshit, his dad and Rumsfeld tell him what to do, and being the good little boy he is, he does. Bush isn't smart enough to do anything on his own, plus he's only in office to extend what his father did. Oh yeah, THAT was unsubstantiated. True nonetheless, unless someone can prove to me that Bush is actually smart? No.
     
  13. hypewaders Save Changes Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,061
    " Baron Max should be banned from this place. No joke."

    That would be a terrible thing to do. Bush supporters are getting more and more rare within relatively intelligent discussion circles. Several formerly-outspoken Bush supporters on Sciforums are still around here, but rarely express their political viewpoints anymore. Let's encourage the the neoconned to stay engaged in the examination of where their radical fad has carried us.
     
  14. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Angel, read that quote above carefully. With the change of just a few words, doesn't that sound like a little kid in the playground teasing another little kid about his parents or his friends?

    Is that they way you'd like to be known here at sciforums? ...just a little kid making fun of someone? ...without knowing a damned thing about them? ...and worse, not willing to learn anything about it?

    Is that what you'd like? If someone doesn't agree exactly with you, you'd ban them from speaking? What does that sound like to you? Perhaps like that same little kid on the playground?? Hmmm?

    I'd also like to say that people continue to forget that President Bush was ELECTED by the voters of the USA ....why doesn't that mean anything to some of you? And since the voters DID elect him, where does that place you in the grand scheme of things? Is it you contention that, perhaps, you know more than all of those voters? And if so, isn't that a bit pretensious of you?

    Baron Max
     
  15. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Maybe he was elected, and maybe he wasn't.
     
  16. Cottontop3000 Death Beckoned Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,959
  17. Hurricane Angel I am the Metatron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    471
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8849936/site/newsweek/

    Hey, look at this: Aug. 6, 2005 - As U.S. troops endured a deadly week in Iraq, 61 percent of Americans polled say they disapprove of the way President George W. Bush is handling the war in Iraq, according to a new NEWSWEEK poll. Thirty four percent say they approve. This is Bush’s lowest rating on Iraq and the first time it has dropped below 40 percent in the NEWSWEEK poll. And 50 percent of those polled say the United States is losing ground in its efforts to establish security and democracy in Iraq; just 40 percent say the U.S. is making progress there.

    and

    Meanwhile, Bush’s approval ratings have dropped to 42 percent; 51 percent of Americans say they disapprove of the way Bush is handling his job as president.

    Hey thats interesting, I mean people DID vote for him and of course that means that they have to agree with everything he does just because they voted for him.

    Pretentious or not, it was never about insulting Bush which you seem to believe. It's because every action he takes is designed to widen the gap between the super rich and the average income citizens, but I don't expect you to learn anything about that?

    Humour me, what are your parents' average income? Because you have the distinct aftertaste of a rich, spoiled, material child from palm springs.
     
  18. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Well, Angel, I'm 61 years old ...born into a very damned poor, but loving family of eight children. I worked my ass off and saved my money, invested in the stock market and I retired at 54 with more than enough money to last me for the rest of my life and then some. Not bad, huh?

    Spoiled? No, I don't think so. Pragmatic? Yeah, for sure.

    And in all those 61 years, Angel, how many times do you suppose I heard young people make these same outrageous, unsubstantiated accusations about our government? Same ones, Angel, same ones since I was born!! I hear them every year, year after year, and yet things just keep going on and on and on.

    We, the American people, elect our officials and then almost immediately try to tell them how to do their jobs .....jobs that WE hired them to do. Is that they way you think things should work? Is tat the way you're going to run your own company some day? ...by letting all the employees tell you how to do your job?

    Baron Max
     
  19. Cottontop3000 Death Beckoned Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,959
    Good for you. I'm so glad that you are proud of being a sell-out. A sell-out that may not even recognize yet that he(?) is a sell out.
    Pragmatic, my ass.

    Yeah, that's how the Nixons of the world like them to remain.

    We elected them? Nice of you to think so. For the politicians that is.

    Yeah, that's kind of the whole idea, old fucking racist.

    Bush isn't the CEO of some corporation, moron. Or did you just overlook that part? Deluded? I think so.

    As if we wouldn't recognize your lame opinion from a mile away.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. Neildo Gone Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,306
    And I'd also like to say that the people, such as yourself, continue to forget that President Bush WASN'T elected by the voters of the USA, but rather by the Electoral College. And do you think Bush would exist as President in '04-'08 if we actually went by the popular vote, which he had the least amount of votes, in '00?

    - N
     

Share This Page