"Bombs Away" sez "O-bam-bay"

Discussion in 'World Events' started by Killjoy, Jan 24, 2009.

  1. Killjoy Propelling The Farce!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,298
    `
    Obama to CIA: Bombs Away! No Let Up in US Drone Attacks

    The CIA's bombing campaign against al Qaeda leadership in Pakistan continued with two more attacks today, an indication, senior officials say, that President Barack Obama has approved the U.S. strategy that has killed at least eight of al Qaeda's top 20 leaders since July 2008...

    ...A senior U.S. official said one of al Qaeda's top 20 leaders may be among the dead today, although it is too soon to be certain...

    ...The new round of CIA bombings came one day after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton phoned Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari. Pakistani officials said the 30-minute call was mostly limited to "pleasantries" but did include a discussion of the need to fight militants in the tribal areas.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. nietzschefan Thread Killer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,721
    Think the CIA learned their lesson? Fixing their own mess.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    Their messes are like dog piles , there everywhere you step.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 歌舞伎 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,285
    seems like a very good strategy to me. I'm happy Obama is refocusing back on the problem.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Didn't realise there was already a thread on it.

    Looks like Americans never learn. One can only hope that they can't afford it much longer.
     
  9. disease Banned Banned

    Messages:
    657
    Of course it's a "very good strategy". It sends the message to Pakistani warlords and tribesmen: you have nowhere to hide, we can kill you from thousands of miles away with our new toys.

    Also, it supports the US military-industrial paradigm, which is the one in charge of the US along with the pharmaceuticals conglomerates and the "financial markets".

    How well would a US president do at trying to control or regulate these corporates and conglomerates, who have the real power? Even the most charismatic pres ever, wouldn't last 5 minutes if (s)he tried to introduce executive orders that cramped the big guns' style.
     
  10. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    While giving you 750 million dollars to make sure you get arms
    http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/15/business/tribal.php

    Now why does that strategy sound familiar?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    edit:

    Boo fricking hoo. The Afghani and Pakistani casualties being as irrelevant as ever.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/25/obama-airstrikes-pakistan
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2009
  11. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    Well looking at the literacy rates of the places you support *cough 40 percent* looks like you don't either.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    It's a freaking war. Innocent people get killed. There really isn't another good way to kill our enemy.
     
  13. StrawDog disseminated primatemaia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,373
    Looking at the grammar and spelling by Americans on this board, it would be better not to comment on literacy.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. StrawDog disseminated primatemaia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,373
    Who exactly is this enemy? Bin Laden? Al Qaida? Terrorists? Islam? Communists? The World? Paranoia?
     
  15. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Yes, yes, yes, no, no, no, no.
     
  16. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    strawdog reminds me of myself when i was around 12-13.
     
  17. StrawDog disseminated primatemaia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,373
    Yes-"Terrorists"-define "terrorist".
     
  18. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    In this case, it would be the Islamist militants that inhabit NW Pakistan and adjacent Afghanistan, bent on re-establishing the Taliban in Afghanistan and overthrowing the government of Pakistan. Their long-term goals include establishing Islamic rule over various states, destroying Israel, and hurting the USA as much as possible.
     
  19. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    The same "Islamists" the US is funding and arming?
     
  20. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Please explain.
     
  21. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/15/business/tribal.php


    http://www.defencetalk.com/news/pub...ans_for_Pakistani_Fighting_Corps110014246.php
     
  22. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Oh, I see, you were stretching the truth in order to make a snide comment about the USA.
     
  23. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Stretching the truth? heh. I'm sure all those tribals appreciate the military training and the dollars. The Taliban did too.
     

Share This Page