TruthSeeker
12-16-07, 01:51 PM
Why don't all the big bang thread go into pseudoscience? After all, it's only a hypothesis, right? :rolleyes:
|
|
View Full Version : Big Bang is Pseudoscience TruthSeeker 12-16-07, 01:51 PM Why don't all the big bang thread go into pseudoscience? After all, it's only a hypothesis, right? :rolleyes: draqon 12-16-07, 01:54 PM * waits until this site moves to pseudoscience or perhaps cesspool draqon 12-16-07, 01:56 PM http://cmb.physics.wisc.edu/polar/web.pictures/firas_spectrum.jpg http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/cobe/ COBE experiment proved theory a fact as big bang being the reason behind universe formation Reiku 12-16-07, 02:08 PM eH.... wtf????? Take your graph, and reverse it by the factor of (r- r'_c^2 x 4) draqon 12-16-07, 02:09 PM eH.... wtf????? Take your graph, and reverse it by the factor of (r- r'_c^2 x 4) Reiku...would you be kind enough to explain the meaning of your factor in this discussion and its relation to the graph I have here forth presented to our exquisite members Avatar 12-16-07, 02:35 PM http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/science.jpg The graph is data from the COBE mission, which looked at the background microwave glow of the universe and found that it fit perfectly with the idea that the universe used to be really hot everywhere. This strongly reinforced the Big Bang theory and was one of the most dramatic examples of an experiment agreeing with a theory in history -- the data points fit perfectly, with error bars too small to draw on the graph. It's one of the most triumphant scientific results in history. Reiku 12-16-07, 02:36 PM Sure... so lonng. of i do this, you will be kind enough to be mates again???? r = rotatiional prcesses (In LZ relativity) r' = the reversed of 'r'.... Npw, it must be raised to the power of 3 by the speed of light, so that information cons=cerning light can extrapolate to the fourth power of the ZPE. Reiku 12-16-07, 02:37 PM http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/science.jpg Did you just agree with me? draqon 12-16-07, 02:38 PM Avatar your use of cartoons in science is distinguished as appraisal of your intellect however your cartoon uses immoral words or curses that in turn aggravate the reader of such cartoon to a very stressful manner that lack the scientific stance one would wish to gain from viewing anything dealing with science (Q) 12-16-07, 02:40 PM Why don't all the big bang thread go into pseudoscience? After all, it's only a hypothesis, right? :rolleyes: A fair question, deserving an answer. Big Bang is theory. |