mercurio
02-10-05, 02:30 AM
I know, I know.
But he/she/whatever's a total jerk, abuses his/her/whatever's mod powers and posts under several names.
so I say ban the sh*thead anyway.
Asguard
02-10-05, 02:41 AM
for starters hes a she but thats beside the point
ban member threads are baned. If you have a problem with a member report it to a mod (starting with the mod of the section of the complaint). If that doesnt get the responce you want apeal to dave.
in the case of mod complaints send a detailed PM to one of the super mods or dave
mercurio
02-10-05, 02:42 AM
OK I will. Toss it out if you wish.
Asguard
02-10-05, 02:43 AM
Just for your intrest this is a quote from dave in the open gov forum
"Effective immediately, SF Open Government is closed to all motions to ban users and all motions to take punitive action against moderators. Complaints about users can be made to moderators directly. Complaints about moderators can be made to me directly.
This forum has proven to be divisive, ineffective, and has taken the focus of members and moderators away from the core discussion forums here. "
mercurio
02-10-05, 02:46 AM
Why do you think I started with 'I know, I know' ? Sheesh, must be early there...
vslayer
02-10-05, 02:55 AM
gah, not the return of ban threads, we should ban all who start them
mercurio
02-10-05, 03:05 AM
Ah, I see this subforum does not HAVE a moderator to toss it out..
As I indicated before, I'll take it up with Dave, then. Just really hate it when people abuse their powers, and it's about a mod. Hence my resorting to the 'return of the dreaded ban'-thread.
Consider it closed, folks. Mercurio out.
Porfiry
02-10-05, 03:07 AM
we should ban all who start them
I agree.
mercurio, tread carefully from now on.