In society all beings are created equal, of course unless you happen to be a woman. These creatures are part of this nation, part of the world, but their control extends to the outer boundries of what we call CULTURE. They are masters of us, of everyone, determining how we think, feel and relate. With women bringing up our children and men genetically programmed for mating it's no wonder there are conflicts arising in the world today.

Thousands of years ago native man fought over food and shelter + the right to couple with 'said female'. This right was bestowed on the strongest in the village, but through time and changes in power women have acquired the right to select 'said male'.

Interview with my previous co-worker from security is as follows:

Question: Are women dangerous?

1. The way they spend your money without mercy
2. The way they drive
3. Way they buy then discard the items they originally desired
4. Extremely poor grasp of real-world situations
5. Attracted to men who are criminals, they find them irresistable.

Question: Do women have to much power in society today?

Yes, because they can send you to jail for crimes that never even happened. Their word carries more weight than a mans. In a divorce custody is usually given despite them collecting alimony + child support from the man. Sometimes it's justified but most of the time it's not.

Question: Do you trust women?

No, its not that they don't keep their word, it's that they don't give it any real respect, they don't follow through with their words. (implying they have no sense of honor, or they do not feel honor-bound by their words)

Seriously! You don't understand why you are a virgin?!

sour grapes, sour grapes.

Seriously! You don't understand why you are a virgin?!

sour grapes, sour grapes.

I no longer care why I am a virgin, I don't care about anything anymore, I would rather just float around time like Dr. Who and never think about the current one I live in. Women will always be mean to me, just now is a good example (implying one was just mean).

You would rather float around time like Dr Who??? HE'S NOT REAL!!! And who cares if a woman was mean to you. Man up already and move on. Eventually you will find one who doesn't think you are creepy and odd, she will think you are quirky and unique. But all women recognize hostility and that you have to let go of.
Do you have Asperger's Syndrome??

I no longer care why I am a virgin, I don't care about anything anymore, I would rather just float around time like Dr. Who and never think about the current one I live in. Women will always be mean to me, just now is a good example (implying one was just mean).You must try mansex. It could surprise you.

I certainly believe they are. That's the exciting part of courtship.
As Kanye West put it..."18 years 18 years, she's got you for 18 years!!"

women have all the control in the society. the have the pity vote and the have the good looks...the kids..(yours) the house. Mostt societies which are free alot women alot of leeway...I think appropriately so.

Women are sorta' like poison ...they should be respected and admired, but only from a good safe distance. Sorta' like Bengal tigers, too ...respected and admired, but from a good safe distance. :D

Baron Max

yeah, you need to change your who;pe personae. GTrow your hair long, get a Harley with loud pipes. get a tan, get a tattoo etc. Its not what is outside thats important but that is what womern will judge you by, you need to ask yourself would i want to be with someone like me? you may need to make some adjustments but there has to be someone out there who would wnat to be with you. jioin a gym too.

Dark is no virgin, he prolly gets off by clowning you idiots for months and months...maybe years.

Dark is no virgin, ....

true, I keep forgetting about his Mom.

true, I keep forgetting about his Mom.

Here we see the danger of females close @ hand. They are angry when their challenged :D

darksidZz:

Thousands of years ago native man fought over food and shelter + the right to couple with 'said female'. This right was bestowed on the strongest in the village, but through time and changes in power women have acquired the right to select 'said male'.

Your assumptions about societies thousands of years ago are fantasies.

Question: Are women dangerous?

1. The way they spend your money without mercy

People can't spend your money unless you give it to them.

2. The way they drive

Women are statistically much safer drivers than men.

3. Way they buy then discard the items they originally desired

You don't know what you're talking about.

4. Extremely poor grasp of real-world situations

And your grasp is excellent, I suppose.

5. Attracted to men who are criminals, they find them irresistable.

False.

Question: Do women have to much power in society today?

Yes, because they can send you to jail for crimes that never even happened.

Wrong. The justice system does not discriminate in favour of women.

Their word carries more weight than a mans.

In general, no. And if you're unlucky enough to live in a patriarchal society, a man's word always carries more weight.

In a divorce custody is usually given despite them collecting alimony + child support from the man. Sometimes it's justified but most of the time it's not.

Once again, your ignorance is astounding.

Question: Do you trust women?

No, its not that they don't keep their word, it's that they don't give it any real respect, they don't follow through with their words. (implying they have no sense of honor, or they do not feel honor-bound by their words)

Your sexism is tiresome. Cut it out or leave sciforums.

Women are statistically much safer drivers than men.
I've heard this, I attribute it to the fact that they make us men do all the driving. Furthermore, they rarely get tickets from police as they can flirt or cry their way out of trouble.

If females are such great drivers, how come no female has ever won the Indianapolis 500?
Wrong. The justice system does not discriminate in favour of women.
Now James, that is just absurd. Female teachers have sex with their students and aren't even charged, while men are run out of town on a rail and then given a hefty sentence. Women murder their husbands, cut off their penis, kill their children, and rarely are convicted.

Not to mention the grossly unfair situation that exists in divorce procedings. The female is always given preference in child custody hearings. Hell, I've heard of a case where a guy had a DNA test proving the children weren't even his and he was still ordered to pay child support!
Your sexism is tiresome. Cut it out or leave sciforums.Come on James. Haven't we booted enough members lately? Without Dark, who would start all the polls?

I've heard this, I attribute it to the fact that they make us men do all the driving. Furthermore, they rarely get tickets from police as they can flirt or cry their way out of trouble.

Actually, I was thinking more of the number of car crashes involving women drivers vs. the number involving men.

Statistically, young (teens - early 20s) male drivers are the most likely to be involved in serious accidents.

If females are such great drivers, how come no female has ever won the Indianapolis 500?

Probably lack of interest.

Now James, that is just absurd. Female teachers have sex with their students and aren't even charged, while men are run out of town on a rail and then given a hefty sentence. Women murder their husbands, cut off their penis, kill their children, and rarely are convicted.

All unsupported generalised assertions.

Not to mention the grossly unfair situation that exists in divorce procedings. The female is always given preference in child custody hearings.

False again.

Hell, I've heard of a case where a guy had a DNA test proving the children weren't even his and he was still ordered to pay child support!

Well one case heard about third hand sure does prove your point!

you can't just generalise and say women are any more untrustworthy than men. It doesn't depend on gender, but on the individual.


No, its not that they don't keep their word, it's that they don't give it any real respect, they don't follow through with their words. (implying they have no sense of honor, or they do not feel honor-bound by their words)

Again, this not only sounds like some women i know, but also some men.. you can't generalise because it creates stereotypes that aren't necessarily true. I reckon you've just met some untrustworthy women in your past, and ur finding it hard to trust another woman again, so you generalise and stereotype, as a way of trying to not get too close to another woman, and possibly get hurt again. i don't know if that's how you feel, but that's the impression i got. lol

i agree with some of the stuff you said, to a degree.. but it's true of both men and women

Well one case heard about third hand sure does prove your point!
I'll find a link later. But it is the law in several states that a DNA test proving you are not the father does not relieve you of paying child support.

WOMAN (http://www.thedevilsdictionary.com/?W), n.

An animal usually living in the vicinity of Man, and having a rudimentary susceptibility to domestication. It is credited by many of the elder zoologists with a certain vestigial docility acquired in a former state of seclusion, but naturalists of the postsusananthony period, having no knowledge of the seclusion, deny the virtue and declare that such as creation's dawn beheld, it roareth now. The species is the most widely distributed of all beasts of prey, infesting all habitable parts of the globe, from Greeland's spicy mountains to India's moral strand. The popular name (wolfman) is incorrect, for the creature is of the cat kind. The woman is lithe and graceful in its movement, especially the American variety (felis pugnans), is omnivorous and can be taught not to talk.
—Balthasar Pober


and also

MALE, n. A member of the unconsidered, or negligible sex. The male of the human race is commonly known (to the female) as Mere Man. The genus has two varieties: good providers and bad providers.

Probably lack of interest.


Wait, lol. Men have interest in it but women don't? Are you implying that women in general have different interests then men? You sexist!

You claim that according to statistics women are better drivers. Isn't that a sexist statement as well?

Darkie, you have it all wrong, one day you will find the right button to press
and when you do hang on to your hat.

http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/f4j/
I bet these guys are just hallucinating sexists, right James R?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism#Discrimination
Lies!!

Of course males are exact copies of women (obviously because it would be 'sexist' to say otherwise).. well except for the external features.

(note for those with naïve views or an otherwise twisted reality in which women==men: this entire post was meant as sarcasm)

Equal in the context here does not mean the same as but with equal right to.
If statistics show that women have fewer accidents than men then that would suggest they are driving more safely. Surely it is no coincidence that insurance rates are cheaper for most women? In the UK the highest car accident fatality rate is amongst men aged 18 to 25. They also have the highest insurance rates.

Women are far superior to men, they give birth and they keep men happy if they want to.

Women are far superior to men, they give birth and they keep men happy if they want to.

Nope. Try again.

www.menarebetterthanwomen.com

I gave you my opinion, if you think otherwise that is up to you. There's really no scientific evaluation that will ever answer this question only our opionions and own living with each other. Who gets the alimony in most of the divorces....women .

I gave you my opinion, if you think otherwise that is up to you. There's really no scientific evaluation that will ever answer this question only our opionions and own living with each other. Who gets the alimony in most of the divorces....women .

Yep. You are exactly right, and that's why this is becoming a growing trend....
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=marriage+strike&btnG=Google+Search

If a man is stupid enough to marry a woman w/o some sort of pre-installed safety net in place (i.e. prenup), then he deserves to pay her alimony.

That's why a prenuptual agreement is being used nowadays to avoid that situation but MEN aren't getting the women to sign up that easy. Women , to the most extent , have not started wars although many believe they are the responsible ones behind the wars to which I don't agree.

`

Only once a month.

That's why a prenuptual agreement is being used nowadays to avoid that situation but MEN aren't getting the women to sign up that easy. Women , to the most extent , have not started wars although many believe they are the responsible ones behind the wars to which I don't agree.

No prenup, no marriage. If one woman won't sign and agree to one, another will. If a guy is stupid enough to go through it w/o one, then gets divorced and burned, then he deserves to pay alimony and lose the house.
Why do you think I posted that link with all the marriage strike articles? Did you even read any of those articles? Probably not.

listin mate women are dangerous but the best way to survive them is to shut up and nod along.

women are not dangerous, most wars are started by men,

we should send women to war would be a nice change dom't ya think? a load of our backs :P

yeah, but women are the reason men go to war, aren't they? Troy effect.:p Poor prince Paris... he was doomed the second three female demons/gods cursed him with being the judge of which of them is the most beautiful.

I wonder which happens more often. Women making men happy, or women making men miserable. Hmm...

As for women being dangerous. Are men dangerous? If you answer no, skip next question. Shouldn't women be dangerous?

I wonder which happens more often. Women making men happy, or women making men miserable. Hmm...


:roflmao: Nice

we should send women to war would be a nice change dom't ya think? a load of our backs :P

you know what a group of PSM'ing women would do the job better than a man would, so go on give it a go!!

s0meguy:

Wait, lol. Men have interest in it but women don't?

Yes. Men tend to be more interested in car racing than women.

Are you implying that women in general have different interests then men? You sexist!

It is not sexist to point out differences, where they actually exist and there is good evidence to back them up. Sexism involves invalidly assuming that differences mean that one sex is better than the other. Compare racism, for example.

You claim that according to statistics women are better drivers. Isn't that a sexist statement as well?

No. It's a simple statement of fact. I do not claim that because women are better drivers, on average, than men, that therefore women are better people than men.

@ James R :-P Unhealthy ehh, so ya got an infracie for dat? ur meanie mr. :L

James R,
You are correct to say women are better drivers, studys show that women have less accidents and tickets when compared to men.

Another difference is the amount of violent crime men commit when compared to women, in America 90% of all violent crime is commited by men.

So my simple question is, if one wanted to try to avoid violent crime what group (men/women) should one associate with?

Willy:

So my simple question is, if one wanted to try to avoid violent crime what group (men/women) should one associate with?

That's very difficult to say. Much violent crime occurs within families, for example. Domestic violence is a huge problem, but you can't force people not to marry who they choose.

Some violent crime is quite random - if you're mugged in the street it won't be because you're associating with any particular people. It will more likely be because you're in a dangerous area, or simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.

In short, beyond obvious advice such as "Don't associate with organised crime gangs" and the like, I can't really think of general advice about associations in order to avoid violent crime. Much better general advice would be "Don't knowingly place yourself at risk by seeking out violent situations or visiting dangerous areas."

Wrong James R,

The question was, if one wanted to try to avoid violent crime what group (men/women) should one associate with?

Men or women?

With the fact of knowing 90% of all violent crime is being commited by men.

The correct answer is, women.

It's unrealistic to imagine you can cease associating with men. Society is approximately 50% men.

It's unrealistic to imagine you can cease associating with men. Society is approximately 50% men.

Wrong again James R,
Your statement has nothing to do with the question. Nothing was said that people can or would compleatly cease associating with men.


So once again James R,

Based on the facts that men commit 90% of all violent crime, if one wanted to try to avoid violent crime what group (men/women) should one associate with?

Willy:

I already explained to you the problems with assuming you can reduce your susceptibility to violent crime by changing your personal associations.

Clearly, if you go and live in a cave by yourself, you'll be unlikely ever to be attacked by another human being. So, you could try that, if you wanted to. If, on the other hand, you wish to remain a member of society, then you should try to promote and support non-violence in your community as well as taking care for your own personal safety. You won't be able to limit your contact to one sex only, if you choose to live a non-monastic life.

Women are statistically much safer drivers than men.
James R,

If I had a women driving for me, would I be "much safer" then if I had a man driving for me?

Willy:

If I had a women driving for me, would I be "much safer" then if I had a man driving for me?

That would depend on which particular woman or man you had driving.

Statistics are based on averages over large numbers of people.

Hint: don't drive with somebody who has had lots of at-fault car crashes in the past.

Wrong again James R

Women are statistically much safer drivers than men.
If women drivers are "statistically much safer drivers than men" as you claim yourself.

Then clearly having a women driver will make me "statistically much safer".

True or false?

Willy:

What is it you don't understand? Have I not been clear?

And when you say "wrong again", what are you asserting is wrong about what I've said?

You're not very good at expressing yourself clearly.

Wrong again James R


Then clearly having a women driver will make me "statistically much safer".

True or false?

True.
But if one looks down on women one might be an irritating, distracting presence. That could skew the figures. But most people are safer with a woman driving.

This might be why he wants to know specific cases.

James R,
You are correct to say women are better drivers, studys show that women have less accidents and tickets when compared to men.


ookay... but what if it means women are simply more careful drivers? It needn't mean they're more skilled.


Willy, you asked "WHAT group" one should stop associating with, to be safe. He was right when he said you shouldn't associate with gangs. You didn't ask "Which of the two", men or women.


And I'm not quite convinced that 90% of crime is on men's shoulders, either. Even if it is, women are still no safer - that means women just use men for the dirty job.

Willy, you asked "WHAT group" one should stop associating with, to be safe. .I never said this.

True.
But most people are safer with a woman driving.
Is that a fact?

James R,
So my simple question is, if one wanted to try to avoid violent crime what group (men/women) should one associate with?

Willy, you asked "WHAT group" one should stop associating with, to be safe

I never said this.


besides, avoiding violent crime is not achieved by either of the options you would like to present here... so it's just not a good argument.

Aiver,
With males commiting 90% of violent crime.

If a person is able to lesson the amount of male incounters in their life, clearly this will also lesson the amount of violent incounters in their life also.

True or false?

In certain situations women might be dangerous. In others decidedly not.

And women do go to war.

Willy:
That's very difficult to say. Much violent crime occurs within families, for example. Domestic violence is a huge problem, but you can't force people not to marry who they choose.

Some violent crime is quite random - if you're mugged in the street it won't be because you're associating with any particular people. It will more likely be because you're in a dangerous area, or simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.

In short, beyond obvious advice such as "Don't associate with organised crime gangs" and the like, I can't really think of general advice about associations in order to avoid violent crime. Much better general advice would be "Don't knowingly place yourself at risk by seeking out violent situations or visiting dangerous areas."

http://www.seykota.com/tribe/FAQ/2005_Oct/Oct_01/confusing.jpg

Women are statistically much safer drivers than men.

Just because women are 'statistically' involved in less accidents than men, doesn't make them better drivers. And if you have never ridden with a woman driver that didn't really know how to drive, then consider yourself lucky. I know several women that I refuse to ride with because they quite frankly, scare me. Men don't typically apply makeup when they're driving. And although I've seen men talk on their cell phones whilst driving, I see it much more prevalent in women; and they pay attention to the road a lot less than men when they're blabbing a way.
I've seen farrrrrr more women do stupid, dangerous, careless shit (like crossing two lanes in order to get into a turning lane, right in front of someone) more than men.

He will not listen, he cannot understand that we know more than him :shrug: at the very least the logic here is simple, women are dangerous and I don't demean or have bad opinions about them as he states. What I speak of is true, but more than that the comments above were part of an interview with a coworker of mine, yet it seems he thinks they were my own :S did you read it all cuz I didn't say the stuff to which you imply I did, those were the answers my coworker gave :L

You must try mansex. It could surprise you.

Are you volunteering to teach darsidZz the way?

mikenostic:

Just because women are 'statistically' involved in less accidents than men, doesn't make them better drivers.

Less likely to have an accident doesn't mean better driving? Ok then.

And if you have never ridden with a woman driver that didn't really know how to drive, then consider yourself lucky. I know several women that I refuse to ride with because they quite frankly, scare me.

A few counterexamples do not refute the point. Remember, we're talking averages here.

Men don't typically apply makeup when they're driving.

Neither do women, typically.

And although I've seen men talk on their cell phones whilst driving, I see it much more prevalent in women; and they pay attention to the road a lot less than men when they're blabbing a way.

And I've seen far more men on cell phones than women. So, our personal experiences aren't going to be much help in finding a statistical pattern, it seems.

I've seen farrrrrr more women do stupid, dangerous, careless shit (like crossing two lanes in order to get into a turning lane, right in front of someone) more than men.

So, you're an anomaly. The proof is in the accident and insurance statistics.

James R: the statistics could be interpreted in other ways. If women are involved in less accidents it could be because of other causes: women have more careful driving styles or there are simply more male drivers than female drivers.

i havent read anything above but all i have to say is.. shes the only thing keeps me sane :)

Wrong James R,

The question was, if one wanted to try to avoid violent crime what group (men/women) should one associate with?

Men or women?

With the fact of knowing 90% of all violent crime is being commited by men.

The correct answer is, women.

Actually if you want to avoid violent crime you associate with men. Why? Becuase violent crime of the type you are refferring to is perpetrated by people you don't associate with.

why is the correct answer women??

for me men are more violent, they commit more murders than women.

women are gentle creatures. .......i can hear the laughs now!! but we are gentle. and women can do more than one thing at once

Dark is no virgin, he prolly gets off by clowning you idiots for months and months...maybe years.

Hey now you are stealing my suspicions.....I think Dark is having a grand old time fuking with you guys.:bugeye:

They're dangerous if they have STD and have access to your cards.

there dangerous if they have a gun or any sharp objects with a bad case of pms

Not to mention they're dangerous when they have smoked crack and you've just insulted them.

is a woman with a gun more dangerous than a man with one? If their intents were one in the same?

p.s. Its pretty funny how you gentlemen sit around and discuss women like they were from vega and spoke in primes. I think you all should put on your big girl panties and read A Room of One's Own. I'm not a mega fembitch or anything, but jesus christ.

women are dangerous they are underestimated... but they are very capable of anything a man can do they are as dagerous as men

1. The way they spend your money without mercy
2. The way they drive
3. Way they buy then discard the items they originally desired
4. Extremely poor grasp of real-world situations
5. Attracted to men who are criminals, they find them irresistable.

1. That's just a stupid stereotype. Incredibly, not every woman is a leech with no self respect.

2. Yeah, because it's mainly young women who kill people through being irresponsible drivers.

3. See no.1

4. I don't even know what you're on about.

5. Bollocks.

Are Women Dangerous?

Just about as dangerous as men. Perhaps you should just look at who is in the jails, mostly men, why you ask, because the women are smarter and get away with things men can't. :D

I no longer care why I am a virgin, I don't care about anything anymore...

Go get some! You wont regret it (Well, 50-50 you may regret it in the morning). But as to your original post. Excellent points. :D

Depends what woman you run into ;)

Depends what woman you run into ;)

A big one with a knife?

A big one with a knife?

Yeah looking down at your pants!!! :eek:

No prenup, no marriage. If one woman won't sign and agree to one, another will. If a guy is stupid enough to go through it w/o one, then gets divorced and burned, then he deserves to pay alimony and lose the house.
Why do you think I posted that link with all the marriage strike articles? Did you even read any of those articles? Probably not.

You say that as if they can't simply be thrown out by the divorce court, and then the man still gets the joy of peying out of his ass for the rest of his life.

Though these might be some good reads for ya...

http://www.amazon.com/Hit-Where-Hurts-Take-No-Prisoners-Divorce-Alimony/dp/1593377398/ref=pd_sim_b_title_3

http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Settle-Less-Getting-Settlement/dp/0385482116/ref=pd_sim_b_title_5

http://www.amazon.com/Beat-Him-His-Own-Divorce/dp/0945253133/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b

http://www.amazon.com/Fair-Share-Divorce-Women-Second/dp/0312354320/ref=pd_sim_b_title_6

http://www.amazon.com/Divorce-Strategies-Every-Woman-Needs/dp/1558506004/ref=pd_sim_b_title_1

I see, so a woman should stay home and take care of the kids but she shouldn't be compensated for it in any way when there is a divorce.

ABS grow up

I see, so a woman should stay home and take care of the kids but she shouldn't be compensated for it in any way when there is a divorce.

Not in the amounts that are usually awarded.

Do you have Asperger's Syndrome??

I resent that! I have aspergers and I am fine around girls. :bugeye:

I resent that! I have aspergers and I am fine around girls. :bugeye:

I actually had to look that up :o wasn't sure what it was.

ABS grow up

Try not defending sexism for once?

Women are like the universe, just when you think you've figured them out, some other shit comes up.

ABS your the same age as me, your a degree student just like me. Think about this, i am doing my rescurch project on mens health. When you think about the fact that for the 2 biggest cancers in the country, that are both treated with the same drug. One group pays over $1000 per treatment and the other pays $30 a treatment. This descrepancy is a MUCH more useful focus of my energy than who gets preferential treatment at bars. Yes thats an irratant but it doesnt come close.

so i say to you GROW UP. If you want to focus on mens issues more power to you, but if you are going to torpedo those who DO actually spend the time to rescurch and advocate for those issues by taring them by association with white mans surpremecy ideals i really have no time for you

..........of all the threads someone could have necromanced, they pick this moronic one.

Im not actually posting here (just waiting for a responce from ABS) but i cant pass this up

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????

seriously did that even make sence???

Im not actually posting here (just waiting for a responce from ABS) but i cant pass this up

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????

seriously did that even make sence???

gonna be a looooooooong wait

You must try mansex. It could surprise you.
Are you offering?

it ok not holding my breath for it

Oh and i worked out what he ment i think

I would have used I would have used resurected rather than "necromanced"