The CIA undercover leaking is an extortion.

It's not a big deal. There is no danger for the exposed CIA undercover officer. But when they make it a big topic, there is something in it.

I think it maybe an extortion on Bush administration. For the security of Israel, The insider group wants more war in Mid-east. Iran is their next target because Iran has the ability to develop nuclear weapon. Bush Sr. and Kissinger visited Russia on Sept. 10. Then Putin came to US meeting Bush. Bush request Russia dropping out its nuclear reactor aiding project but was refused. Or a secret deal to take Iran was not succeeded with Russia? CIA case out broke right away after that.

Israel poised to attack Syria and Iran, or better, let US start another war for Israel. Bush, embarrased by failure to find WMD in Iraq and downward economy in domestic, unwill to start another war in Mid-east. That's why he is extorted. Israel's recent attack on Syria might be an erge.

If the CIA leak case is silenced, then a deal may has been reached and another war in Mid-east is at hand. P.S. Iran might have felt the coming danger and hurriedly suspended enrich uranium program on 10/22.

Quote, "U.S. Air Strike in the Middle East imminent?
From Scottish CND, 03.11.2003 23:47
Since Saturday, people in the Highlands of Scotland have been witnessing large movements of US warplanes overhead. Experienced observers say the large numbers are reminiscent of those that preceded the bombing of Iraq in 1998 and military strikes on Libyai in the1980's as well as the first Gulf War.At the weekend warplanes were flying over at a rate of roughly one every 15 minutes. As well as watching them from the ground the plane spotters have also been able to overhear pilots talking by listening to their radio frequencies.

It is thought that the planes have flown on a route from the US over the north pole to bases in Europe and the Mediterranean. The size and scale of the movement suggests that the US may be preparing to strike at a country in the Middle East in the next week to ten days.

Please pass this information on as widely as possible- the US may be planning to use the pretext of "foreign" terrorist attacks on US personnel in Iraq to attack Iran or Syria.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/11/279864.html

Well I don't think the US would actually attack Iran IMO, rather it would be a Israeli operation. Why? Because the Americans cannot even attempt a invasion in at least the next 5 years. If the US were to attack Iran, Iran would attack American forces in S.Iraq, and a whole debacle would ensue, and Iranian attacks on Israel and even the oil emirates states would commence. Iran is much bigger then Iraq, both in size and scope. There are various topographic features, and a even more nationalistic people then in Iraq. In Iraq a invasion or attack of Iran would descend into a massive battle with all Shi'a factions against the US. It's in the US' best interests to leave the Iranians alone.

Things are not looking good in Saudi. The weekend attacks, followed by the Saudi govt. sending thousands of troops to Mecca (bad, really bad idea) adds up to unprecendented pressure on the ruling family. An Iran-style (and perhaps encouraged / funded / supplied) Islamic revolution would be one thing that might bring some serious American air power to bear. That is, if we are dumb enough to try to shore up a Saudi collapse.

Bush Says U.S. Would Wage War Again to Make World Safe

LONDON (Reuters) - The United States would wage war again, and alone if necessary, to ensure the long-term safety of the world, President Bush said in an interview published Monday.

"I set big goals," he said. "I know what we're doing is going to have a positive effect on this world."

http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Breaking&storyId=799470&tw=wn_wire_story

Bush used the same reason to start Iraq war. He will do it with same reason for more war. Israel starts a war? not likely. They get others to fight and die for them. That others is US.