American concern over Tibetan occupation , Human rights , political repression , democratic reforms , executions yeah, right ,sure .….. whatever.
It's something I wish was a far fetched notion, and I feel as if one point it was a far fetched notion. At least with the US doing the torturing for US interests, one could claim that it's legitimate on national security grounds, saving American lives (not saying this is a correct position, but it's one that many like to argue). Torturing on behalf of another nation's interests however abandons any hope for a moral justification.
How come the only one who seems to know about this is a escapee from the psych ward, aka, as Brian Foley? Now also if you care to read a little further in the report, here is what doesn't make sense, in the report: If we are going to interrogate the Uighurs for the Chinese, by torture?, and the Chinese are not squeamish about torture for their own purposes?, why would we refuse to turn them over to the Chinese? Foley get back on your meds.
I suppose the question is this: IS it ethical to deprive a person of some sleep and some food prior to interrogation? To tell you the truth, I don't think it's all that bad to keep waking a person during the night and maybe they miss a meal. I mean, we used to do a hell of a lot worse back in my fraternity Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Still comes down to the information in the story, why would we torture the Uighurs for the Chinese, and then deny Chinas request for extradition, because we were concerned for their safety/human rights?
It is because you are brain damaged , how else could you of qualified to waste 40 years of your life in a loser military career . Here are other major papers that carried the story . New York Times Tampa Bay Times Something that doesn't make sense you , how unusualPlease Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Perhaps America still needed to interrogate them further , Fuck ...... Oh Christ next it will be these photos you somehow possess of me .
