I'm just interested in hearing about alternative ways of managing economies besides the almighty dollar. What ideas or experiences have you had, and why would your method be better then what the USA currently uses?

Most of the world is using monetary systems. the question is exchange rate and international trade. the nation whose currency is being used as an international certainly reaps additional benefits, it can "outsource" lots of economical troubles, get addicted, and do everything to preserve its sole status as a currency dealer. Some people suggest to use "energy" currency i.e. express price of all goods and services in Watts (not dollars) first and go from there.

KENNEDY.... was going to create... silverbacks...

bills.. based on silver.. and backed by it in a vault.

he got shot in the head.


lincoln... was going to make green backs... he got shot in the head.

and the guy who shot lincoln.... WAS A BANKER.


if you plan on doing any changes to the floating value of americas debt currency, you had better talk to the banks first.

those that dont.. tend to end up dead.

-MT

I'm just interested in hearing about alternative ways of managing economies besides the almighty dollar. What ideas or experiences have you had, and why would your method be better then what the USA currently uses?
Take a lesson from ol' Kim Jong-il: Counterfeit the almighty dollar as your best alternative to The Almighty Dollar.

He ain't doin' Yuans, Francs, Pounds, Pesos, Yens, Roubles, etc.

Wonder why... http://www.sciforums.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

(Edited a time or two more, just because I can and I'm rebellious by nature.)

KENNEDY.... was going to create... silverbacks...

bills.. based on silver.. and backed by it in a vault.

he got shot in the head.


lincoln... was going to make green backs... he got shot in the head.

and the guy who shot lincoln.... WAS A BANKER.


if you plan on doing any changes to the floating value of americas debt currency, you had better talk to the banks first.

those that dont.. tend to end up dead.

-MT

Why were they shot, killed? What good would their systems have brought out? I know this may be complex to write out but please try. This is interesting. I never did research on this topic. Thanks.

this is consiracy theory.... so... takes as such.

its not mine either.

banks... make alot more money... with debt currency.

because of interest. paid to them.... on money they invented out of nothing.



both lincoln and kennedy were going to change this......

both would have robbed the bankers of the world of their control and power and all that precious interest.

it would not of detroyed banking... but it would put it in its place.


well that hasnt happened... and banks run the world.. and own most of it.

and most of the world is indebted to them.

so.. they rule the world.

luckily their not really evil.... just alittle greedy... with all that interest on what is literally.... monopoly money.

it works... dont get me wrong... and has worked... as is evidenced in the growing economies of the world.... and in such a complex system banks are nessasary.. and useful.

and banks preform alot of regulatory actions as well to manipulate economies.... and generally function for the good of the world... in theory.



but... that does not limit them from having global ambition and or intentions which would of been damaged by political policy changes proposed by now dead presidents..... especially those two.


there are alot of conspiracy sites which speak volumes about this, if you google it im sure your find alot.

-MT

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=56580