What is the difference?
1) A perfect vacuum;
2) An absolute vacuum;
3) An ultra-high vacuum;
and,
4) A hard vacuum.
Thanks :cool:
A perfect vacuum is defined as a region in space without any particles.
An absolute vacuum is defined as space with the absence of particles at a temperature of zero Kelvin.
Ultra-high vacuum is a controlled environment created to take pressures down past 1x10^10 Torr. Pressure range.
A hard vacuum is used to describe a controlled environment of low pressures where extreme forces are involved.
Thanks (Q).
Re. the 'perfect' vacuum: Does 'no particles' mean no EMR?
Curious :cool:
Stryder
03-19-03, 09:06 PM
I thought there was no such thing as a "Perfect Vacuum" because of "Zero-point" :D
Fafnir665
03-19-03, 09:19 PM
wouldnt zero point just behave better in a perfect vacuum?
James R
03-19-03, 09:58 PM
I have to disagree a little with (Q) on this.
A "perfect vacuum" and an "absolute vacuum" are, in my opinion, different terms for the same thing - a space devoid of any matter.
"Ultra-high vacuum" is a technical term referring to an atmosphere with a pressure of less than about 10<sup>-8</sup> Torr.
"Hard vacuum" is a loose term usually used to refer to the conditions in outer space.
percomplexed
03-23-03, 03:59 AM
zero point refers to EM energy which has no mass. a vacuum is determined by measuring pressure, which requires mass. therefore, ZPE does not affect vacuum definitions.
Beercules
03-25-03, 08:17 PM
But EM radiation has relavistic mass and curves space like matter does. Given that, shouldn't ZPE demonstrate that a perfect vacuum is impossible?