A Paradox Duo

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by (Q), Dec 14, 2002.

  1. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    1) Easy is hard and hard is easy.

    2) Easy is equal to hard.

    Prove the paradox duo true anyway you can.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. metal722 Registered Member

    Messages:
    26
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. %BlueSoulRobot% Copyright! Copyright!! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,294
    This reminds me of Macbeth:

    "Fair is foul, and foul is fair
    Hover through the fog and filthy air"
    (Act 1, Sc 1)

    I think I've got something on this:
    We see this paradox as easy to explain, but in actuality it is very very hard. (Q) however, finds this easy when we find it hard (explaining the latter part of #1).

    Easy = hard...does #2 mean anyone can understand it? Or that, things which are easy are quite hard to some people, while something that is easy to those same people is tough on others?

    Is it all a matter of perception?

    -Blue :m:
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Halo Full Time Nerd-Bomber Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    587
    By george I think she's got it!
     
  8. Neville Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    696
    Well can someone elaborate please?
     
  9. Tyler Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,888
    Bluesoul, I take it you're in the midst of studying Macbeth in school.

    For starters, there's no need (actually, it's wrong) to put the second part of the witch's first speech ("Hover...."). They, and other characters, restate the "fair is foul and foul is fair" bit a few times - it is the important part. And on top of that, I don't think this quite relates to Q's problem, however I may be wrong. The witches are stating a reversal of moral order and moral right. This line in Macbeth is used to accomadate many things, though.
     
  10. pumpkinsaren'torange Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,159
    well, at LEAST macbeth was better than hamlet. *coughnotsayingmuchcough*
     
  11. %BlueSoulRobot% Copyright! Copyright!! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,294
    Meh...I never knew we weren't supposed to quote the second part. My teacher's a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    I beg to differ: I thought it was very pertinent. In comparing two different things (easy:hard, fair:foul), I thought quoting Macbeth might help us clear things up by providing another example. However, (Q) hasn't said anything yet...so I guess it's still all in speculation.
     
  12. EvilPoet I am what I am Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,007
    Prove the paradox duo true anyway you can

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    I'll give it a try ...

    Easy is hard and hard is easy.

    Easy money can be hard to come by.
    Hard-earned money can be easy to
    lose.

    Easy is equal to hard.

    Easy is equal to hard because both
    represent money.
     
  13. On Radioactive Waves lost in the continuum Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    985
    1. easy falls under catagory hard, and vica versa.

    2. exactly what is implied by #1
     
  14. %BlueSoulRobot% Copyright! Copyright!! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,294
    Oh! I know how "Hover through fog and filthy air" can be related to "Fair is foul and foul is fair".

    Fog = grey.
    Hover = neither on the ground nor floating away.

    Therefore it is in the middle. There is no right or wrong, no black and white way of explaining it. By being both foul and fair at the same time, you are neither foul nor fair, but something of the two. They're interchangeable? As with hard and easy? Maybe.

    Where's (Q) with the solution? I would like to hear the correct answer...
     
  15. Fukushi -meta consciousness- Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,231
    ?

    the following sentence is true,
    the previous sentence is false.

    :bugeye:
     
  16. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Where's (Q) with the solution?

    I'm here - still waiting for someone to come up with a solution.

    *hint*

    "Synthesis"
     
  17. %BlueSoulRobot% Copyright! Copyright!! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,294
    :bugeye:

    One thing: is this a chemistry question, or a philosophical question?
     
  18. Halo Full Time Nerd-Bomber Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    587
    It's all relative. Easy is hard, just not as hard and hard is easy, but not so easy.
     
  19. %BlueSoulRobot% Copyright! Copyright!! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,294

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Excuse me for a minute.

    5.

    4.

    3.

    2.

    1...

    !!!BOOM!!! *brains splatter against the wall*

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    I'm even more confused than before

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. Halo Full Time Nerd-Bomber Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    587
    *picks %BlueSoulRobot%'s brains off the wall*

    Hehe you silly.

    My mind is not yet apt to think Hegelianly. How do you combine thesis and antithesis to prove that Easy = Hard? Me confused.

    Will continue to ponder until brain splatters on the wall.
     
  21. %BlueSoulRobot% Copyright! Copyright!! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,294
    *runs for cover*

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Perhaps (Q)'s talking about synthesis reaction? I've been learning about it in Chem...maybe he means that a chemical reaction is easy to perform, yet very difficult to reverse? But..that makes no sense when it comes to the second sentence.

    (Psss...Q, you can tell us if we're warm or cold.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    )
     
  22. 1119 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    243
    Halo, maybe you're on the right track - thesis and anti-thesis. Q did hint at synthesis. I'm thinking something along that line too.
     
  23. 1119 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    243
    Q,

    I think it's been long enough. How about your solution? Please....?
     

Share This Page