A few comments on the "Look!" thread before I begin. During the past week I didn't have the time to visit Sciforums since I was dedicating my efforts to my studies. Upon revisiting the "Look!" thread, I find that it degenerated into a no-holds-barred debate against the "the fountainhed". While "the fountainhed's" initial posts showed some composure, he eventually regressed to the language and tactics of those he was debating. In retrospect, it wasn't hard to see why the thread was closed.

However, I have created this thread as an extension of the previous "Look!" thread with one caveat; in the interest of keeping this thread open, I ask those who I believe are capable of change to make a few revisions to their current methodologies. In particular, I wish to address spookz and the fountainhed. Not too long ago, both of you used to post well though out, logical arguments, and I ask that you return to such practices, and not be drawn into the gutter by the detritus that lies within.

Finally, I realize that this post is a bit lengthy with all of the quoting, however, I am only "double quoting" so the relevant material is contained in this thread.

On that note, I continue the debate, and hope that the aforementioned posters will curb their tongues, but not their wit.
Originally posted by gendanken
Daphy:

I have a decent idea of what I am dealing with. I debated you, and you bowed out. See here: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...5047#post455047
No, <Vulgar comment that does not bear repeating>, you don't.
And as predicted you bounced back with the link I thought you would. If you had not been scripted the way your kind always are you would have rebounded with this one:

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=28758

.....where *you* left off perhaps in distaste, exhaustion, or <Vulgar comment that does not bear repeating>. That's where you first tried to sell me that cute "petitio principii" of yours.
The main reason I "left" was simply because I kept illustrating the fallacies your argument, and you kept trivializing them. Frankly, there was a glaring hole in your logic from the beginning, simply being that you have absolutely no idea what happens after a person dies, and any assertions to the contrary are pure conjecture on your part, however, I didn't bring up that point since I thought that you could see the error of your ways without the debate turning into one of agnosticism versus atheism. However, it seems that is the direction the debate tended towards regardless of my attempts.

Also, please note where I made a fallacy of presumption, or as you state, a "Petitio Principii" (http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/skepticism/blfaq_fall_beggingquestion.htm).
Originally posted by gendanken

I would like to see where you believe I addressed you as an "old friend", since I doubt I ever posted such a thing

I don't have to and you didn't.
So why did you even state that I engaged in such behavior in the first place?
Originally posted by gendanken
Only remember that the "Tiassa at Sciforums' thread had zilch to do with you until *you* came around squealing like a piggy that I 'prove' to you my calculus. Remember not?
Yes, I do remember. I made no assertions otherwise, and I even clearly stated my motivation for initially posting in that thread. Are you trying to raise some point with this statement?
Originally posted by gendanken
So put the monocle down <Vulgar comment that does not bear repeating> kiddo because you'll need them to read closer:
Charlatans come in all flavors, my dear, and your obsessive kind are the easiest ones to dissect.Must I repeat myself ad infintium? I have repeatedly stated that any claim that I make can be subjected to verification, if one simply poses specific questions directed towards myself. To the best of my knowledge, I have not made any fraudulent claims, and I would appreciate it if you would list my statements which you believe to be misrepresentations of my knowledge/ability. Without your supposed evidence, your characterization of myself as a "charlatan" is baseless.
Originally posted by gendanken
Lastly….


I have no interest in being your "friend", "buddy", "pal" or any such relation that could be misconstrued as myself holding any trace of fondness for you or the foul mouthed, pseudo-intellectual tripe that you regularly post.
Neither do I come here to get chummy so grind all those axes and jinx the misnomers. Again, then why did you assert the contrary when you stated the following: "Lip service.

I 'met' you in one thread, thought I'd finished you and went elsewhere only to only find your ugly head in the same one addressing me as if we're some kind of old friends, and then here you bring me up for nostalgia. Hmmm........."

You seem to be conceding points rather quickly and quietly when evidence is produced that is in opposition to your ideas.
Originally posted by gendanken
Its all about your parlour games and the headache you gave me once.Parlor games? If you characterize my logical arguments as parlor games, then on that scale, what do your posts rate? Elementary insults at best, I assume?
Originally posted by gendanken
Now pick yourself out of here and consider it settled or I will. Go away.The simple truth of the matter is that you are trying to avert the "eyes of the forum" from the fact that the two times you have debated with me, you have lost, plain and simple. I assume you wish for me to go away so you can debate other forum members who are quick to anger. Subsequently, you and your comrades tear apart their posts once their thought processes have been degraded by emotion.

Frankly, I find it odd that if I don't respond to a thread, you are quick to bring that example to the forefront of others' attention, but when I respond, you simply wish to consider the debate "settled", and move on.
Originally posted by Xev
Gendanken:
Hands off Redoubtable, he's mine.

gendanken, I find it interesting that you appear to take orders from Xev. Do you actually respect her opinion? Do you obey her out of fear? Or did your actions simply happen to coincide with her statement?

Now, onto my comments on other posts from the "Look!" thread.

Originally posted by Redoubtable
Simpleton.
I'm a student of Latin. I'm glad it hasn't given you a superiority complex. (For the humorless, that was a use of sarcasm.)

I hope that you are studying something else in addition to Latin, for there are few things that are more useless to study than a dead language that only imparts the ability of "impressing" others with obscure terms, while drawing attention away from the meagerness of your arguments. Apparently, you do little other than debate semantics, since it is one of the few tools in your arsenal. However, it may be one of the meager fruits that your study of Latin yields, so I presume you consider it to be a great asset.
Originally posted by Redoubtable
As for Lingva Latine . . .

Verba mea dubites et verberes, sed tamen nobilioribvs hominibvs eadem scripta svnt accepta et svnt credita. Pertvrbatvs, sedes fortiter in invtile et hvmile genitis fvroris. Mane nece in tva solitvdine sine solacio hvmanitatis! Tv, cvivs mens est oblita et est clavsa cvpiditate, ostendes bene sese esse tantvs caecvs.
Now, I am no student of Latin, nor do I aspire to be. However, roughly translated, your above statement reads:

My words you may doubt and you may beat, but yet to the noble men they are taken and are trusted. Confused, you sit useless and low, and give birth to madness. Remain in solitude until death without the comfort of human feeling! You, of whom mind is forgotten and is closed by passion, you will show yourself to be blind of such things.

A uselessly long statement without substance. Essentially, you hide your poor insults in the guise of a foreign language in an attempt to make your statement gain importance. However, we live in an age of information, thus translators (http://www.quicklatin.com/) for even the most archaic of languages can be found with little effort. Thus, you can no longer hide your poor arguments and insults under the veil of Latin. You will actually have to construct proper arguments to support your ideas, rather than relying on parlor tricks.

I have discovered gendy and xev's true vocation in life:On

QI on the BBC last night it was revealed that Henry VIII had a Stool Groom. This was a very highly regarded position in the King's Court because of the quality time you got to spend with the King. Unfortunately the job entailed wiping The Royal Arse

http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/29131

Groom of Henry VIII's Royal stool:
http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/Bios/AnthonyDenny(Sir).htm

From this day henceforth, those wretched jezebels gendanken and xev shall be known as:



gendanken : Groom of the spookster's stool


xev: Groom of wraith's stool

...hurry up wench, I just had an extra spicy vindaloo, and it's gone straight through me like a hot knife through butter.....in fact jezebel.....I might just make you use your tongue.........

let dapthar run with this

*points noted and appreciated:)

Daphy:
No, ((Vulgar comment that does not bear repeating)), you don't

Vulgar comment that does not bear repeating read as follows:
No, you cunty curmudgeon, you don't.

Also, please note where I made a fallacy of presumption, or as you state, a "Petitio Principii".

You've bold/italized it all on your own, fellow.
Gendanken said that death was the know all end all.
Daphy then comes along wagging his finger to project the human ailement on a glass window altogether just to 'prove' there was some kind of fallacy in thinking that death was an absolute.

Its really simple, strawboy. Got worries? Mamma drama? Bills? Taxes? VD? Its all over when you're over.

Read up on this will you? Tetrapylotomy- the art of splitting a hair four ways. That's what you do. What's ugly is that you do it not to show that you're right, but that another is wrong. Spiteful labor is always charming.

you have absolutely no idea what happens after a person dies, and any assertions to the contrary are pure conjecture on your part
According to you, we'd have the plague of the repo man and the IRS still plaguing one in the ~afterlife~.............Fucking interesting.

So why did you even state that I engaged in such behavior in the first place?


"As if we were some kind of old friends". Like we're some kind of old friends....

"as" and "if" is the stuff of allegory, symbolism, analogy. "Like" is the stuff of similie.

Surely you don't think I'd really think we're some kind of 'old friends', do you? the Fountainhed is supposed to be the swallow-without-tasting gimp around here. No need for a coup.

Frankly, I find it odd that if I don't respond to a thread, you are quick to bring that example to the forefront of others' attention, but when I respond, you simply wish to consider the debate "settled", and move on.

Negetive. Finish where you left off.

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28758&perpage=20&pagenumber=3

Its waiting like a bitch in heat.


Must I repeat myself ad infintium? I have repeatedly stated that any claim that I make can be subjected to verification, if one simply poses specific questions directed towards myself. To the best of my knowledge, I have not made any fraudulent claims, and I would appreciate it if you would list my statements which you believe to be misrepresentations of my knowledge/ability. Without your supposed evidence, your characterization of myself as a "charlatan" is baseless

Charlatan is not only a trinket word used to describe greasy gypsies selling cough tonic and gadgets that don't work. Its also used for cantankerous bores that sound like dusty philosophers. Its also used in describing those that go around believing they are some kind of still waters that run deep when its more like a boiling cesspool of hydrochloric acid when they're no longer comfortable.
Tiassa is another one. We call him Tessie.

Let it go Daphy. You want to continue fighting war machines, do so on a campus.

Wraith:
gendanken : Groom of the spookster's stool


xev: Groom of wraith's stool


If you truly believe this you're peeling an empty banana, grand master pendejo sin bolas.
This Jezebel holds both you fucking poodles with the same amused tolerance she has for squealing Michael Jackson fans.

*successful arguments against the dank one is characterized as hair splitting.

*successful arguments against the dank one are simply ignored

*successful arguments against the dank one are hijacked and claimed to be her own

a failed assertion will be rephrased and claimed to be her original argument

*posters will be accused of misunderstanding her intent

*questions that have negative implications for the dank one's argument will be routinely ignored

*limits are imposed on the time taken to respond. when this arbitrary time is exceeded, the dank one declares victory

*a negative characterization of posters is employed in defeat by the dank one. typically, one will be likened to a beast and/or sexuality is called into question

Churl:
*successful arguments against the dank one is characterized as hair splitting.

A nip on the nose is characterized as a 'successful' stab to the heart by those spiteful wretches who'd delight in the fall of their betters.

*successful arguments against the dank one are simply ignored

Ignoring that his war horse ignores just as well is characteristic of the same vindictive maggot

a failed assertion will be rephrased and claimed to be her original argument

You missed a star.

*posters will be accused of misunderstanding her intent

Challenge her authority and he will roar and kick the sofa with his hot belch of insecurity.


Pause. Ok........what the hell am I doing? I'm killing houseflies with bullets when it comes to spooky.

Whatever. If I had that poodle's spine in my hands right now I'd grind it to dust and sprinkle it on my cheerios.

Originally posted by gendanken

Charlatan is not only a trinket word used to describe greasy gypsies selling cough tonic and gadgets that don't work. Its also used for cantankerous bores that sound like dusty philosophers. Its also used in describing those that go around believing they are some kind of still waters that run deep when its more like a boiling cesspool of hydrochloric acid when they're no longer comfortable.
Tiassa is another one. We call him Tessie.



HEY!!
Leave my people out of it.
Our elixers and gadgets always work, gaji.

Yes, a mutherfucking continuation indeed! I will seep to low fucking levels and revel in the stupidity of it all:

So......Once upon a fucking time in sciforums, the hed was reading and posting whilst going through the drudgery of compile and edit at the lab. Simplistically, as always the hed is fucking bored; a debate with wesmorris promises to provide intellectual stimulus and so the hed is waiting... Out of the blue, comes a fucking message from the fat bitch: "Pardon the Delay" + link to a thread the hed could give a shit about. But oh, wait one fucking second! This is Gendanken! The bitch who got pissed because the hed called two of her threads inane when the perpetual nice guy Sarge suggested them for nomination in the Hed’s original fountainhed awards. Ah, well this is fucking interesting, thinks the hed. This bitch is certainly less predictable than Xev, lets see what kinda fucking holes I can put the bitch through for some fun. These sentiments about her predictability in relation to Xev and our first encounter are here: Start here and move go on: (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=26494&perpage=20&highlight=Original&pagenumber=6) .

So the hed replies to the fat one: Surprise me, I am bored.

The fatty replies: Hmm.
"Me pregunto por si el fountainhed sabe lo que esta haciendo. Cuidado. How dare you.” Already I'm "LOL" from translator use and the unpredictability.

So the hed digs the fucking hole further: "LOL. Me thinks since a year after I got out of the womb, I have known what I have been doing. How dare I? Surely...."

Gendanken responds: Surely not. To reach out and touch in the silly guise of 'boredom' is as see through as spooky's little game of poodleing. So, what does my fountainboy want from me? To do circles? deal out some aphrodisiatic solipsist mush? "chat" like a pleb? "Me pregunto por si el fountainhed sabe lo que esta haciendo. Cuidado" Translation: I wonder if my fountainboy knows what he's doing. Be careful." Reading this shit still makes me chuckle.

The hed is getting impatient: Don't think too much. I guise not my intentions. I am truly bored. Wesmorris did not offer the intellectual stimulus I needed for he has to chill with fam. You are online and you have a habit of surprising me, what else is there?
And it is surely,..You cannot think this little of thefountainhed.
"aphrodiastic..." You have a way with the adjectives...
Spookz is a moron I had fun with uuntil he started getting pissed. What do I want from you? To surprise me, pick how.
Translation: I wonder if my fountainboy knows what he's doing.
Me tiase', me nye akura be wo timi ka nkwasia sem twere no
Laconic Translation: Woman, I know where I thread." For any that know psychology, this is a setup for what follows: And appeal to the ego to get a view of the psyche of the observed. First loop coming shortly.

Gendanken: "Oohh..ohhh-Oh. A multi-lingual double surprise. Double whammies. Lucious duplex.....seems you've surprised me..
Crave stimulation as I do then? Grand. I'm seconds from posting a pretty up in my language thread. That's right...mine. Mephura gave it to me, he spoils me filthy. You can hear my thoughts sizzling there. If not, and you really are bored and I'm only serving as your (shudder) "placeholder".........then what the devil do you want, my dear? A strip tease? Some cyberfondling? Bare my fangs and squeal surprise? Around here I can do the latter......but I don't waste mindspace on just anyone. Nino sonso.

"Woman, I know where I thread."
But know not where'st thou tread, yes?"

Hed: No placeholder, and surely you dont expect a placation of your ego.
But know not where'st thou tread, yes?
nae
Surprise me woman!

And then the Gendanken responds: I'm madly in love with you. I picture my talons scratching sweet nothings on the black of your beautiful skin. I throb like a blood clot just thinking of you. Hecate has come and gave me her secrets...she's a trickster that one and gifted me charms.
Row with me, loverboy, down the river Lethe and drown your sorrows in oblivion.
You and I like thumb and forefinger will pick the world that cries us out for mercy.

But nay....I can't hear the moaning. I am whiling away making glorious love to my Nubian god. My fountainboy.

At this point, my man wesmorris finally posts and I have better things to do, so I simply respond: LOL. woman...

At this point, the hed was ready to observe and see the effects of this whole nonsense on an ego so fragile it jumps on a fucking fly meters away.


One effect:
“Watchutalkingbout, Willis? Oh hush. I prefer my Nubian gods silenced and stone drunk on Brandy.
Damn sexy.”

EDIT TO this:
I am gonna emerge out of my self-imposed silence(meditating) to say this: Sarge, that was pathetic and shameful. You sounded like a whipped sissy crying for his mama after getting bitched slapped. Absolutely disgusting. You state an opinion about who you think creates the best threads and you end up apologizing??? What the fuck is with you bro? Get the fuck up man; stand and defend your fucking opinions and don't let people walk over you like a fucking punk! man, fuck. I am so fucking disgusted I am gonna take a shot of Brandy and take a walk.


From here: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28160

Eventually, the hed decides to end the ‘cease fire’ for the bitch is more amusing when hostile.

So after many “debates”—mark that one doesn’t really debate with the fat bitch for she will go through all the points that Spookz makes in the post above. She has reached her last resort: call the hed ugly and a gargoyle. Now, let’s see where the bitch proceeds. So now that I have practically dishonoured myself by publically posting pms, I’m gonna go smoke…

moron eh?

Eh spookz, he is. If you're going to be a devious fuck and post private messages, that's one thing.

But they ought to be private messages that humiliate your opponents, not ones that reveal what an idiot you are.

Verba mea dubites et verberes, sed tamen nobilioribvs hominibvs eadem scripta svnt accepta et svnt credita. Pertvrbatvs, sedes fortiter in invtile et hvmile genitis fvroris. Mane nece in tva solitvdine sine solacio hvmanitatis! Tv, cvivs mens est oblita et est clavsa cvpiditate, ostendes bene sese esse tantvs caecvs.

You may doubt and attack my words, but these same writings have, nevertheless, been accepted and believed by men nobler. Confused, you sit in the low and useless creations of delusion. Till death remain in that your wilderness without the solace of humanity! You, whose mind has been blurred and closed by spite, prove yourself to be utterly blind.


Wonderful . . . did I insult you in some way, Dapthar? :rolleyes:

Spock:

moron eh?
Appeal to the ego.

Originally posted by thefountainhed
Spock: Appeal to the ego.

;)

however for a guy that demands accuracy in names (hed not head), you are doing a piss poor job with mine

Originally posted by Xev
Eh spookz, he is. If you're going to be a devious fuck and post private messages, that's one thing.

uhh i was referring to the "Spookz is a moron" quote.

My favorite bitch:
You are getting lazy B; at some point, your retorts could be said to have imagination. Hell, at one point you could even be said to have been intriguing. Now, it is the same repetitive nonsense lacking in imagination. You keep chasing nonexistent ghosts and wasting your time pursuing whimsical solidarity when you should seeking other avenues and letting the fat one chase. You’ve become a pathetic bore and I am getting annoyed. Get the fuck out of the corner where you sleep, and step into the center.


Spookz:
however for a guy that demands accuracy in names (hed not head), you are doing a piss poor job with mine
:cool: Laziness + hypocrisy + purposefulness. Either way, Spookz it shall be.


D-ble:

You may doubt and attack my words, but these same writings have, nevertheless, been accepted and believed by men nobler. Confused, you sit in the low and useless creations of delusion. Till death remain in that your wilderness without the solace of humanity! You, whose mind has been blurred and closed by spite, prove yourself to be utterly blind.
You realize the above to be absolutely pathetic, neh? 'Men nobler' have believed and accepted "lacrimating copiously?' Yea, those men are 15 year old high schoolers with egos big enough to fit the dank ass. You claim spite when I have been relatively 'nice' to you fool. Do not delude yourself fool; your attempts at flaming were juvenile and your reasoning behind the attempt pathetic. I suggest you leave it be, until the conditions imply that you, by 'you' only, must necessarily attempt a retort. Capice?

First, I would like to address the fountainhed. At least in this thread, please keep your profanities and vulgarities to a minimum, since if you continue your present behavior, this thread will most likely be closed. Thank you.
Originally posted by gendanken
Daphy:
You've bold/italized it all on your own, fellow.
Gendanken said that death was the know all end all.
Daphy then comes along wagging his finger to project the human ailement on a glass window altogether just to 'prove' there was some kind of fallacy in thinking that death was an absolute. Yet, the logic still holds, and is not hampered by your attempted trivializations.
Originally posted by gendanken
Its all over when you're over. Again, you assert this with the utmost certainty, when you haven't a clue as to what actually happens after one dies.
Originally posted by gendanken
Read up on this will you? Tetrapylotomy- the art of splitting a hair four ways. That's what you do. What's ugly is that you do it not to show that you're right, but that another is wrong.Again, you trivialize objections in an attempt to strengthen your argument, instead of addressing the issue at hand. You could try something new, and actually try to deliver a proper counterpoint. However, I am beginning to get the impression that this task might be beyond your scope.
Originally posted by gendanken
According to you, we'd have the plague of the repo man and the IRS still plaguing one in the ~afterlife~.............Wow. I wonder if when you read posts, you simply remember what you would like to have read. To refresh your faulty memory, here is what I posted earlier in the "Hatred" thread:

Consider a man who is a member of the "Alcor Life Extension Foundation". Assume he makes some poor financial choices, and with the exception of his life insurance, he has not a penny to his name. The bill collectors come calling, and due to the stress induced by these dire straits, the man decides to commit suicide. However, before he does, he places a call to the Alcor foundation. He then kills himself, the Alcor team arrives at his house, and some short time later, he is vitrified. According to your assertion, now that he is dead, his problems are over. Some time in the future he is revived, and, according to you, he should no longer have any financial problems, since his problems died with him. However, it is obvious that he is still penniless, since his life insurance paid for his stasis, thus killing himself did not end his problem.

I never asserted that after death the man went to the "after life", nor did I assert that bill collectors still bothered him. I only stated that he died a poor man, and after being revived, he was still poor, proving that suicide did not solve his problems.

My argument was simply a logical extension of current scientific techniques. If, at some time in the future, people can truly be revived after being vitrified, the above thought experiment is entirely plausible. One would think that someone who based their user name on the German term for a thought experiment would be able to understand one. However, you did misspell it, so maybe I should have taken that as a sign. (By the way, the proper spelling of the word is gedanken, but that only means "thought". The proper term for a "thought experiment" is gedankenexperiment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_experiment).)
Originally posted by gendanken
"As if we were some kind of old friends". Like we're some kind of old friends....

"as" and "if" is the stuff of allegory, symbolism, analogy. "Like" is the stuff of similie. Reduced to analyzing grammar, how pedantic. You may not realize it, but by concentrating on grammatical nuances, you simply accentuate the fact that you are avoiding the points I raised.
Originally posted by gendanken
Negetive. Finish where you left off. Why should I bother? I have already stated the fatal flaw in your argument in my previous post, and in the "Hatred" thread, I already discussed examples that further destroy your argument. Unless you have some new point to address, the "Hatred" thread will continue its journey to the archives.
Originally posted by gendanken
Charlatan is not only a trinket word used to describe greasy gypsies selling cough tonic and gadgets that don't work. Its also used for cantankerous bores that sound like dusty philosophers. Its also used in describing those that go around believing they are some kind of still waters that run deep when its more like a boiling cesspool of hydrochloric acid when they're no longer comfortable.More conjecture about my character that you have no means of supporting. Is this all you have left?
Originally posted by gendanken
Tiassa is another one. We call him Tessie.I frankly don't care if you call him Mr. Ed. However, if you are trying to state that there are similarities between tiassa and myself, you would actually have to know something about my character first. I have only made a few statements addressing such matters, and since I doubt that any of them can be correctly likened to characteristics that are portrayed in tiassa's posts, your comparisons are moot.
Originally posted by gendanken
Let it go Daphy. You want to continue fighting war machines, do so on a campus. I find your self-characterization as a war machine rather humorous. If one were to choose an accurate mechanical analogy, then a broken vending machine would seem to accurately describe your posting style. You continue to dispense only one thing regardless of the circumstance, poor arguments filled with profane language.

Frankly, I grow tired of your poor arguments and vulgar language. I suggest that if you cannot present a well reasoned, logical argument that is free of vulgarities, then you should simply concede. Or, you could follow Xev's example, and simply ignore my posts, and merrily go along your way. One would think that the moderator of the Philosophy forum would have above average debate skills, but Xev seems intent on demonstrating the contrary. However, if her previous replies are any indication of her debating abilities, then remaining silent is her best option.
Originally posted by Redoubtable
Wonderful . . . did I insult you in some way, Dapthar?
No, you did not. However, I find your posts seem to support that stereotype that those with knowledge tend to "place themselves on pedestals". I find that the people who are the most knowledgeable are usually the most humble, and those that know very little are quick to condescend. Little do you realize that if those whom you learned from (either from other people directly, or from textbooks) behaved in such a manner, you would not posses the knowledge you so readily vaunt. So, in closing, I suggest you not behave in such an arrogant manner.

fountainhed:
You are getting lazy B; at some point, your retorts could be said to have imagination. Hell, at one point you could even be said to have been intriguing. Now, it is the same repetitive nonsense lacking in imagination. You keep chasing nonexistent ghosts and wasting your time pursuing whimsical solidarity when you should seeking other avenues and letting the fat one chase. You’ve become a pathetic bore and I am getting annoyed. Get the fuck out of the corner where you sleep, and step into the center.

*Yawns*
You operate on six hours sleep in forty eight hours and then not having anything truely amusing to reply to. Entertain me and I might perk up.

HAH! I am operating on less than 4! You used to be more amusing...:(

This place used to not suck like a toothless hooker.

You know what? I bet a blow job from a toothless hooker would probably feel better than one from a toothed one-- assuming like skill. Therefore, I think I would prefer a blow job from a toothless hooker at this pathetic juncture. A least I only have 2 damn hours! All that said, I think one from you would probably be best, neh? :cool:

Originally posted by Xev
This place used to not suck like a toothless hooker.

Toothless hookers make so much more money then guys who give hand jobs.

Gum me, baby.

I'm bored. You're boring. Do something to be interesting.

Coffee:
You're selling yourself on the wrong street corners, then.

...You're boring...
That's fine, a good blowjob from you will provide enough entertainment for the two of us.

I suppose you're correct, Xev. I need to stop selling myself outside of Wal-Mart. I should go somewhere that's cheaper and draws the scummy type to it's seamy under-belly. Hmmm, sounds like I'm going to K-Mart.

I'm finding it difficult to concentrate. Sleep is no where in sight! Fuck sleep! Who needs it!

You're either trying to win this "argument" by symbolically degrading me or you really are trolling for abuse.
Either way, you're still boring.

Coffee:
Try the parking lots of those "twenty four hour liquer" stores.

I'm not boring. Or wait, is that comment not intended for me? Obviously not. My many movie references are hilarious. My exploits are famous. And my porn site get's thousands of hits a day.

you're still boring :(

You're smiley only helps prove her point. However in my thread you are quite entertaining. Bravo!

Coffee:
Paint a better picture, build a better mousetrap or make better bestiality porn and the world will beat a path to your door.

I don't paint, I'm not an inventor, and I don't enjoy that type of porn. I'm back to writing shitty articles for the newspaper. I like how they reject me: "Dear Sir, your review of The Cat In The Hat is not appropriate for our type of publication. You might want to try Playboy or Penthouse."

You're smiley only helps prove her point
That I am boring? Hell I hope so; it's 7:40 am! I used to depend on her for entertainment, but lately she has been lacking that certain something. Oh well...

Maybe you're missing something.

Yea. why the hell this conversation is proceeding down this path. I simply need her to amuse me, and this stupidity is in a way, subconsciously amusing-- almost like an incessant stabbing from the dull edge of a knife--annoyingly amusing.

Coffee:
I think you are reading a different version of the Cat and the Hat than I did. Penthouse? I think they only review books like "Poststructuralist feminist theory: An introduction" and "Neo-Hegelian interpretations of the French and Indian Wars"

thefountainhed:
You just suck then, don't you?

Well, cat was spelled with one P, one U, two S, and a Y. I just figured that it must be the same book. What with all the crazy machines that are used in the giant orgy scene with those furry things.

I’m sorry, I just had a Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas moment. Damn bats were everywhere.

the fountainhed:
You want amusement, go back to dressing up in your grandmother's old housedresses and masturbating to pictures of the Olson twins.

Coffee:
Oh, that version. That's why I stopped buying books that have coauthers listed as "Harry Harddick and H.P Lovecraft"

Xev:
I was wondering why Dr. Seuss' name had been removed from the book. I just thought it was a re-imagining.

Oh well, back to dressing up as a pineapple and stalking William Shatner.

Where the hell did that come from?

You want amusement, go back to dressing up in your grandmother's old housedresses and masturbating to pictures of the Olson twins.
LOL! Now that's a crazy fucking image. You are amusing me already. Heck, I think I want to fuck some sense into you. Right now however, I am depleted and will do with your presently witless retorts. Oh yea, where's that pic of your ass Les marquis du pretense brought up?

Coffee:
Where the hell DID that come from? What are you, Scout?

thefountainhed:
Le Marquis, unless there's more than one of him. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be.
What is with this fixation with my ass?

Xev:
I'm afraid that my knowledge of scifi is interfering with my worldly affairs. I just had a conversation with Captain Janeway. It ended when I bitch slapped her, with a bible.

I've obviously slipped into some sort of crazy psycho kung-fu crap. I have no idea what's happening right now.

What is with this fixation with my ass?
:eek: this question has already been asked and responsed to.

I can't say that I'm surprised by the inane conversation that has occurred on the second page of this thread, since Xev and CounslerCoffee seem to be making a habit of posting drivel wherever they can. I guess its not surprising that Xev has the largest number of posts, since the majority of them are one-liners or nonsensical garbage that should be relegated to an instant messenger service. She and CounslerCoffee seem to not realize that forums allow for one to collect their thoughts, hopefully making for a more intelligent discourse. Rather, they seem to prefer acting like adolescents who waste their time discussing idiotic subjects.

Apparently, I would have been wise to heed Wraith's initial warning about wasting my breath. Despite my attempts, this thread is slowly descending into the depths of insanity, and it is being dragged there by Xev and CounslerCoffee.

The aspect of this I find most ironic is that if any other posters were in engaging in such childlike behavior, i.e. filling up threads with their inane, off topic banter, they would be quickly reprimanded. However, I think that since the parties involved are moderators, the administrators are a bit more hesitant to take action.

This thread has served its purpose, for it has continued the dialogue in the "Look!" thread to its conclusion. If this thread is to be closed in the near future, then so be it. However, I would like to ask one favor of the administrators before I close this post, mainly, please examine the recent posts by Xev and CounslerCoffee, and take the appropriate action. I realize that everyone has their bouts of odd posts, however, there is a difference between brief lapses, and those who go out of their way to post utter nonsense on a regular basis. In my opinion, I believe that Xev and CounslerCoffee fall into the latter category, and as such, the appropriate action should be taken.

EDIT: I just happened to notice this statement under the New Site Rules (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=20330) sticky:Posts that interrupt a serious thread with ANY inane comments that in no way, shape, or form relate to the original topic, will be deleted. Threads that repeat a previously posted theme may be merged or deleted in its entirety. I hope this supplies the necessary grounds to support my suggestions, and possibly even the deletion of the errant posts in this thread.

have you got anything to say in your defense?
why disrespect dapthar when he quite clearly made his intentions known with regards to the direction he wanted to take this?

Originally posted by Xev
Stay on topic, please. Spookz,

lets see, you deleted my post and admonished me. such hypocrisy
perhaps you guys can engage in some self moderation. delete your posts.

A nip on the nose is characterized as a 'successful' stab to the heart by those spiteful wretches who'd delight in the fall of their betters.

excellent. you admit your failures. i will leave you alone to nitpick about the magnitude of your error.

Ignoring that his war horse ignores just as well is characteristic of the same vindictive maggot

since 99% of our dialogue has been one where you have been presenting the argument, it is i asking the questions, not you. if you disagree.......

You missed a star.

indeed

Challenge her authority and he will roar and kick the sofa with his hot belch of insecurity.

what what? neurons misfiring again?

Pause. Ok........what the hell am I doing? I'm killing houseflies with bullets when it comes to spooky.

ahh, insects now. lemme tack that on

Whatever. If I had that poodle's spine in my hands right now I'd grind it to dust and sprinkle it on my cheerios.

ahh, back to beast i see. enjoy your meal even though i am not part of it

Originally posted by thefountainhed

. . . "lacrimating copiously?'

You claim spite when I have been relatively 'nice' to you fool.

Do not delude yourself fool; your attempts at flaming were juvenile and your reasoning behind the attempt pathetic.

I was translating for Dapthar's benefit, not as an invitation for you to throw your refuse my way.

As for "lacrimating copiously," even you, Thersites, know that I have caught you in more errors than ever you me, be they peccadillos or not.

Ah . . .

You've been so nice to me, in fact, that you feel compelled to write nice with quotation marks. :rolleyes:

You say my attempts at flaming were 'juvenile'?
Flaming itself is juvenile.
My reasoning was pathetic?
I had no reasoning; flaming itself is unreasonable.

I'm willing to admit that I'm childish, but you . . . you're above that, aren't you? :rolleyes:

I mean, my God, man, you criticized me over my zeroes, my badges of honor.
For Chrissakes, bud . . .

As for "lacrimating copiously," even you, Thersites, know that I have caught you in more errors than ever you me, be they peccadillos or not.
LOL! Thersites eh?

You've been so nice to me, in fact, that you feel compelled to write nice with quotation marks.
Subjectivity, bud... Besides you were being arrogant and a follower...

You say my attempts at flaming were 'juvenile'? Flaming itself is juvenile.
Yes the act of flaming is fundamentally juvenile, but this classification does not impact my classification of your attempts.

My reasoning was pathetic?
I had no reasoning; flaming itself is unreasonable.
The latter part of the statement above is incorrect. Reason for me would be for me amusement; for the dankass, bitternes, insecurities, etc. You were being a follower...

I'm willing to admit that I'm childish, but you . . . you're above that, aren't you?
No of course not. Flaming is amusement, and I will engage in it during certain moods. Therefore yes, I can be childish. See, I am not above admitting it.

I mean, my God, man, you criticized me over my zeroes, my badges of honor.
Eh? Drop it fool, before I tear you to peices. HA HA HA HA ... I corrected for you were being an ass.

For Chrissakes, bud . . .
Let's leave Christ out of this one mate.

Fountainboy:
Now, let’s see where the bitch proceeds. So now that I have practically dishonoured myself by publically posting pms, I’m gonna go smoke…


Fountainboy:
You, sir, have the predictable stamina of the classroom sodomite who’ll trek to the ends of the world with evidence that the girl really did wink at him. What you’ve done just now was show us the a-b-c’s of exactly how the classroom fugly goes about the court of appeals with his circumstantial evidence insisting that the girl in the third row really was on his mangled Carribbean penis.
The case being dismissed, he’ll appeal to the higher court and having been sent away, off he goes to the federal branches, the Supreme courts, the presidency and the potentates until 10 years later where we find him on the street corner obnoxious and filthy petitioning bystanders with his documentary ‘evidence’, the pages yellowed with age and inanity.

I’ll make it so there’s never any toxic misunderstandings again: It was a fucking joke, a gag.
I find you incredibly unattractive.
I do not want you.
Cybersex is pathetic.
Chatting is pathetic.
You asking for my internics was pathetic. I already knew, but even not knowing the fact that you were an eyesore would have no bearing on it being a joke. I don’t get chummy online, period.
Only exceptions would be with those I find intriguingly familiar, of which I only know three. And you, sir, are by no means one of them.

You’re a social butterfly no matter which you look at it, my boy. Forever in bondage to what your betters have long since put away and don’t need, you’ll never taste the freedoms of your superiors.
E-v-e-r.
You’re the harmless brand of cocky- a combination Felix the Cat mixed with a Puff Daddy fucking drunk on cheap moonshine. You have the finesse of a sailor with scurvy, going home with the first ghettobird on deck that passed you a smoke.
If not the first, then the second one that’s mildly tolerable but far from ideal. The next day you’ll log on and tell all your little online friends about your sexual conquests they all already take to be fluffed up lies.
Given physical locality I could pop that little arrogance balloon of yours with my pinky nail, Oh my brother.

Dapthar:
You, sir, are from the school of Comparative Irrelevance, the kind to research the symbiotic dynamics of a Cabbage patch doll if it meant the difference between miserably failing an argument or saving face.

Long ago Gendanken comments to a depressed whino named Cool Skill that suicide could cure all his woes:
”There’s absolutely nothing a shiny bullet can’t fix”- gendanken

This is the one comment for which you decide to jump on the gendy’s back for being too succinct.
Then Gendanken calling a new age alarmist a clueless haranguer was also too blount.
And sooooo because your kind is used to esoteric tomes the size of a bathtub to explain the simplest things in the universe, you asked that I explain my comment in a tedious type language that only you could read.

No need. Perhaps you see why Dapthar. You having to appeal to some bogus scenarios of cryogenics to drag the poor man back from his suicide and back to his problems for the sole purpose of corroborating your peevish attempts to prove I’m some kind of wrong just makes it clearer to see why.

You want technical jargon? gorgeous syllogisms? Spartan dyanetics? Boolean reasoning?
Some kind of ontological tautology employing constructs dicotomizing the sub-postulates of the psychosocial conditions apropos so long as I include the word ‘paradigm’ in the study? Fat chance.
Not my slylo.
Try Tessie.

CounserCoffee:
Fucking Boring

Spookz:
You, sir, are a sniveling spectator. Your computer either gives handjobs and talks back to you or there’s a fleshy appendage connecting you with the hardware because you’re always here.
Hmmmmm…..
Your game is Follow the Leader, with you licking the Alpha male’s sack with one eye on his scrotum and the other on the glorious bitch you’d like to see hanged.
What you require is an audience- not a critic- and so in the midst of your drama this violent need for attention you have clouds what could very well be a playful, joyful, fragile nature I could easily rupture.
Argue with a Spooky and he’ll roar with indignity, fury, frenzy and a fucking swarm of exclamation points.
But hail Mary when his prayers are answered and he’s granted the godsend of a warhorse he could hide behind, a Daphtar or a Fountainboy as easy to tear to shreds as he is, and he’s back in his corner egging them on.

You’re a moron who doesn’t know the ropes, and if you at least knew some ropetricks but still be a moron you wouldn’t be the disgusting expendable you are now.
You’re a proverbial lounge lizard, Mr. Spookz, doomed to the lobby and never allowed in.
In person, you’d crumble like pie crust. Bark and yelp all you’d like but you, sir, are my bitch.


Anyone else?

You, sir, have the predictable stamina of the classroom sodomite who’ll trek to the ends of the world with evidence that the girl really did wink at him. What you’ve done just now was show us the a-b-c’s of exactly how the classroom fugly goes about the court of appeals with his circumstantial evidence insisting that the girl in the third row really was on his mangled Carribbean penis. The case being dismissed, he’ll appeal to the higher court and having been sent away, off he goes to the federal branches, the Supreme courts, the presidency and the potentates until 10 years later where we find him on the street corner obnoxious and filthy petitioning bystanders with his documentary ‘evidence’, the pages yellowed with age and inanity.
LOL. I suggest you look at the meaning of "on my dick". This would be you first clue. Second, I posted all the nonsense to show you that I wanted amusement from you...

I’ll make it so there’s never any toxic misunderstandings again: It was a fucking joke, a gag.
And where is the misinterpretation?

I find you incredibly unattractive.
Thanks

I do not want you.
Good for you

Cybersex is pathetic.
I agree.

Chatting is pathetic.
I disagree

You asking for my internics was pathetic.
Internics? What the fuck is that, and when did I do such?

Only exceptions would be with those I find intriguingly familiar, of which I only know three. And you, sir, are by no means one of them.
Thanks

You’re a social butterfly no matter which you look at it, my boy. Forever in bondage to what your betters have long since put away and don’t need, you’ll never taste the freedoms of your superiors.
E-v-e-r.
LOL! You truly are insane. Realize that the hed likes to amuse himself by seeing where he can lead fools like yourself. As for this nonsense with 'betters', more power to you...

You’re the harmless brand of cocky- a combination Felix the Cat mixed with a Puff Daddy fucking drunk on cheap moonshine. You have the finesse of a sailor with scurvy, going home with the first ghettobird on deck that passed you a smoke.

LMAO. I have no clue who Felix the cat is... And actually, most girls I do fuck, and like to fuck, behave just liek you: Arrogant, stubborn little bitches. This is my sickness.

If not the first, then the second one that’s mildly tolerable but far from ideal.
LOL. I see.

The next day you’ll log on and tell all your little online friends about your sexual conquests they all already take to be fluffed up lies.
My sexual exploits eh? So once I log online during the "awards" thread, drunk and fucking high and I basically dabber on about stupidity. Another time was with Wesmorris in a PM. I have no "little online" friends... But your characterization of me truly is amusing.

Given physical locality I could pop that little arrogance balloon of yours with my pinky nail, Oh my brother.
Anytime baby girl, University city; philadelphia.

Later babygirl, we shall continue.

Originally posted by gendanken
No need. Perhaps you see why Dapthar. You having to appeal to some bogus scenarios of cryogenics to drag the poor man back from his suicide and back to his problems for the sole purpose of corroborating your peevish attempts to prove I’m some kind of wrong just makes it clearer to see why.
Bogus? If you don't like that counterexmaple, I already stated the fatal flaw in your argument, however, I don't see you raising any qualms about that particular point. Perhaps your selective memory was at work once again.
Originally posted by gendanken
You want technical jargon? gorgeous syllogisms? Spartan dyanetics? Boolean reasoning?
Some kind of ontological tautology employing constructs dicotomizing the sub-postulates of the psychosocial conditions apropos so long as I include the word ‘paradigm’ in the study? Fat chance.
Not my slylo.
Try Tessie.You apparently want those who you debate with to fill in the holes in your argument for you, since you constantly trivialize the holes in your argument, and keep repeating that people are "misinterpreting your point". If you had a well-defined point to begin with, those kind of objections wouldn't occur, but apparently, you are incapable of such reasoning.Originally posted by gendanken
Anyone else?You state that as if you have actually accomplished something other than illustrate your stupidity to all who have read your previous post. Here's a hint, vulgarities and personal attacks do not constitute a successful argument. Neither do vague ideas that are horribly unsupported. Apparently this is a lesson you have yet to learn.

goddamn soap opera!

:D

consider product placement in following posts please. revenues are low this quarter.

Dapthar:
Apparently this is a lesson you have yet to learn.

And apparently the lessons of
one) your "argument" of my not being able to deduce the simple notion of a human's problems dying with him stinking to hell of last-resort-hairsplitting

and

two) you being fucking inconsequential

are ones you have yet to learn.


I don't know how well read you are my dear but right on cue you bring to mind this callow youth named Robert Wringhim in "Confessions of a Justified Sinner".
He was the kind to stare at you with the Gorgon eye in disbelief that you dared disagree with him or uttered something quite 'blasphemous'.
He'd repeat word for word the conversation, question or disagreement that led you to throw a chair at him in the first place. He would troll around town following a happy go lucky youth named George, plaguing him with his "debates" when the fabulous Geroge was too busy playing tennis or discussing philosophies with those that weren't the obnoxious bores the tedious little Robert was. I picture him with dark circles under his eyes and a dry breath straight from the cemetary. Death. Dust. Strawman.

You can also picture him downplaying a war machine down to a vending one. Its all in the script, my lord.


Fountainboy:

Game over.


However.........the delicious games have just started here:

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29745&perpage=20&pagenumber=2

That being said-
Fountainboy:
Second, I posted all the nonsense to show you that I wanted amusement from you...

The curious ends a wounded hyena would go for a chuckle……..
Realize that the hed likes to amuse himself by seeing where he can lead fools like yourself

The curious way in which the waterboy swears he’s the quarterback….
As for this nonsense with 'betters', more power to you...

*flips hair*

“Thanks”

I have no clue who Felix the cat is

Clue: a slumbitching alley cat who swears he's a Mufasa yet his feeding off scraps and hot garbage only proves he’s a filthy, posing, fucking little pussy…

But your characterization of me truly is amusing.

I’m laughing my tits off. I'm assuming you're laughing that delicious, desireble, wantable, fascinating, covetable, alluring and delicious Caribbean dick of yours off too, yes?

Anytime baby girl, University city; philadelphia.

Later babygirl, we shall continue.

No need. Your spine snaps louder in my hands when the world is watching it on a forums thread than they would in Philly.

To put it in a churlish language that’s likelier to get through to you, here’s a little somethin’ somethin’ from your homeboy Mr. Jay-Z:

“Everytime your name was brought up
I would act all nonchalant in front of an audience
Like if you was just another shortie I put the naughty on
But uh, truth be told you do for a loop, this Hov
I'm too old to be frontin when I'm feeling Denzel
And you acting like you ain't appealing when you are…….. “

*giggle*

LMAO. I have no clue who Felix the cat is... And actually, most girls I do fuck, and like to fuck, behave just liek you: Arrogant, stubborn little bitches.

Really? It must be awfully hard for them to be arrogant and stubborn when fumbling for their crackpipes and picking at their herpes sores. More power to 'em.

This is my sickness

Besides herpes?

You, sir, are a sniveling spectator.

that reminds me to get my flu shots

Your computer either gives handjobs and talks back to you or there’s a fleshy appendage connecting you with the hardware because...

both.

...you’re always here.

love the attention tho i can see why it would pose a problem for you

Hmmmmm…..
Your game is Follow the Leader, with you licking the Alpha male’s sack with one eye on his scrotum and the other on the glorious bitch you’d like to see hanged.

hmmmmmm
i could have sworn we were all insects. so who is the alpha male this time
tiassa? hed? dapthar?

What you require is an audience- not a critic-

i cannot have both?

and so in the midst of your drama

dear lady, it is you who demonstrates a pathological need for drama. i recommend you read your posts again to get an idea of this

this violent need for attention..

see what i mean? an extreme need for drama. as for violence, i believe you want to grind my spine yes?

you have clouds what could very well be a playful, joyful, fragile nature I could easily rupture.

dearie, if you could, i'd doubt if you would have held back. as evinced by your post, the only thing that has been ruptured is your fragile ego. what clouds do you refer to? a neuron out of sync?

Argue with a Spooky

you lie. you yet have to argue with me. i however, do so with you. your responses are typically that which had been pointed out in the "inner workings" post. i am afraid i cannot characterize these as arguments.

and he’ll roar with indignity, fury, frenzy and a fucking swarm of exclamation points.

move on dank one, the tone has changed.

But hail Mary when his prayers are answered

i have to confess i get a perverse sense of delight and satisfaction to see others tear your thought processes to shreds. is that so bad? is it so sinful?

and he’s granted the godsend of a warhorse he could hide behind,

you project. my ego is not fragile as yours appears to be.

a Daphtar or a Fountainboy as easy to tear to shreds as he is,

alpha males no longer?

and he’s back in his corner egging them on.

i rather characterize the"egging" as "moral support".

You’re a moron who doesn’t know the ropes,

the ropes being? do you really think the forum idiot will be allowed to teach anyone the ropes? do you think anyone listens to the forum idiot?

and if you at least knew some ropetricks

as in hindoo fakir and such? the only rope trick is the one where i fashion a noose/kick the stool/blah. the sound effects are marvelous. perhaps a demo?

but still be a moron you wouldn’t be the disgusting expendable you are now.

oy vey, this is getting tedious

You’re a proverbial lounge lizard, Mr. Spookz, doomed to the lobby and never allowed in.

oh tedious drama, oh tired old cliches. you, my dear dank ass, are a unimaginative and tired old hack. what was it i said once before? oh yes, "catty" is what the pseudo arts and music crowd do. it's all they got!

In person, you’d crumble like pie crust.

and you, little girl, would know this for a certainty, yes? your lack of judgement does not bode well for your continued existence. i would exercise caution

Bark and yelp all you’d like but you, sir, are my bitch.

but of course dear. well here goes..

arf arf arf
yap yap yap
grr grr grr
foam
bite
rip

Anyone else?

you feel you are done here? do you not understand that there is no escape for you in here? (mallory)

This is a lovely fight. Does it has a fictionary environment too? Like on a parkinglot outside of K-Mart? The Fat Bitches accidentally collided into eachother with their stuffed shopping carts and along came the Fountaincleaner to hose them down with the soiled water from the Spooky Toilet and then called Nurse Daphne for help? How do I join? Who should I insult first? Do I need to make up a character or will you provide me with one?

Fat bitch:
Notice the progression of Gendanken’s retort in accordance with Spookz' 'points'...

Game over.
***Raised eyebrow***

The curious ends a wounded hyena would go for a chuckle……..
A wounded hyena, eh? This could only come from one as illogical as you. Yes, many crazy things do in fact fascinate and amuse me...The most obvious is the human ego; especially when the ego is based on vacuous foundations. Case and point you Gendanken: A creature that attempts to thread on all that rip apart her baseless and illogical arguments. A creature so convinced of her superiority, she will try to contradict an assertion by made a PhD in math, when her knowledge in math does not extend beyond 1st year Calculus. A creature constantly quoting Nietzsche, Camus, etc, and placing them on pedestals, and then claiming that by virtue of this citation, she belongs amongst their ranks. A creature who creates nothing; wants to be part of everything; a creature that claims superiority and even believes herself to be superior, when in truth she is a creature so contemptuous of her lack of knowledge, so seeped in self hatred, so desiring of association with those whose intelligence she values, she is willing to 'degrade' anyone, including Coolskill??? if that individual presents a viewpoint that will contradict with hers. This all started because the fat bitch was upset for the hed characterized two of her threads as pointless? You are truly a specimen worthy of amusing for this is all you can be…Remember this Gendanken: "Amalgamate the inane, the ephemeral, the vapid, the illogical, equvocal, the nonsense, the denial, and you have a typical gendanke response. Bullshit typical Gendaken reply: Scream and scream, if that does not work, dodge all assertions, if that does not work, try some amazingly pathetic attempt at character assasination, if that fails, simply ignore and lie to the ego; oh and don't forget the classic "look this up:"(obfuscated bullshit that is unneeded or some pathetic 8+ letter word that Gendaken just discovered). This is you in all your essence: loud, obstinate even in the face of reason, and occupying a stupid high horse you don't belong on." Scream and assert your superiority all you want, you are simply groping nonexistent walls. This won’t change that fact that mere repetition will not create what you lack.

The curious way in which the waterboy swears he’s the quarterback….
Oh please. The hed does play football and he is a cornerback. Disregarding this inane compare, I believe my treatment of Xev, and how she amuses me and was amusing me before I encountered you is enough proof.

“Thanks”
You are welcome. You have demonstrated an affinity for illogicality, what else can I propose?


Clue: a slumbitching alley cat who swears he's a Mufasa yet his feeding off scraps and hot garbage only proves he’s a filthy, posing, fucking little pussy…
You know, your inconsistency in assigning me the apha role and the subversive role is amusing. You are simply amusement when the intellectual stimulation I crave for when I come is nonexistent. In order words, if there is nothing interesting going on around here, I let you back on my dick. Am I Mufasa? Hell who gives a rat’s ass? The whole point is that I do care to create a delusional fantasy where I am a superior to any that poses a valid argument to any bullshit I present. I am secure enough to withstand any such crap; you are so fucking insecure, you will chase the nearest fly, if you see it as able to deposit her eggs on you. You claim superiority, and yet every nuance of your behavior and reflected psyche proves otherwise.

I’m laughing my tits off. I'm assuming you're laughing that delicious, desireble, wantable, fascinating, covetable, alluring and delicious Caribbean dick of yours off too, yes?
No, not really. The contemptuous smirk that I almost always have on my face when addressing your posts has morphed into an impatient stoniness. I am starting to get annoyed…

No need. Your spine snaps louder in my hands when the world is watching it on a forums thread than they would in Philly.
You make an assertion and you backpedal?


To put it in a churlish language that’s likelier to get through to you, here’s a little somethin’ somethin’ from your homeboy Mr. Jay-Z:
The pedantic twit that is you attempts to label a representation of this language as “churlish”? I can imagine you, going to your community school, head held high and looking upon your classmates with feigned contempt whilst spewing nonsense you have absolutely no clue about to ignorant peers and annoyed teachers. This gives you the sense of superiority. You are surrounded by degenerates and attempt to label all as such, without knowing that you yourself, fat one, are a degenerate. You come here and you characterize the hed as a ghetto wannabe and assign behaviours to the hed when only in your experience could you have known such behvaiours. In order words Gendaken, you can only hope… I am that irresponsible middle class black boy that sells weed to ignorant White boys and girls. I am also that irresponsible middle class black boy that fucks you.

“Everytime your name was brought up
I would act all nonchalant in front of an audience
Like if you was just another shortie I put the naughty on
But uh, truth be told you do for a loop, this Hov
I'm too old to be frontin when I'm feeling Denzel
And you acting like you ain't appealing when you are…….. “
Now obviously you listen to a lot of rap from your speech; it is also apparent you have no fucking clue what is being said, for you would not present a quotation that contradicts with every freaking assertion you have made. But what else is new? This is your second clue of the day: “I'm too old to be frontin when I'm feeling Denzel
And you acting like you ain't appealing when you are……..”
Since I am sure you missed it, realize Jay was speaking about Beyonce, realize also that the two are fucking each other, and realize also that you are an absolute moron.



Hed. Annoyed with the bitch.

Xev:

Now, now, you imganation lacking cloud of pretensious tripe, you will post when you have been addressed. Now as to this foolishness:

Really? It must be awfully hard for them to be arrogant and stubborn when fumbling for their crackpipes and picking at their herpes sores. More power to 'em.
No, more power to the trailer dwelling freak on nature that swears she understands Nietszche when everything is from a cliff note: You. Realize, you nitwit, the cliff notes exist only to present an amazingly compressed, shallow and simplistic view of anything remotely complex. But then again, how else can you comprehend? Now you multiple personality suffering insecure fool, begone until you have anything slightly imganitaive to spew.

Besides herpes
No, besides enjoying the fucking holes you will fall through.