Hello every one. I am not sure if this topic has been discussed here before, but there is a plethora of information on the Internet regarding the 911 attack on the Pentagon. Supposedly a commercial jetliner crashed into a part of the Pentagon that was under repair. The aircraft supposedly struck the outer wall at an angle of perhaps 30 degrees. From the published television and other photogtraphic sources there is one striking feature of the attack that seems rather odd. Let me ask you all a question. Have you ever seen the debris of an aircraft that has plowed into the ground or otherwise crashed and was totally destroyed? What are the scenes you remember that are universally common to all these crashes? Inevitably there is a recognizable tail section, perhaps some massive jet engine remains and other smaller and unrecognizable aluminum parts scattered all over the place. Does this seem familiar? Google on '911 Pentagon Attack' In the Pentagon attack there is virtually no, that is zero, nada, keine, nix, nyet, zilch aircraft debris anywhere. No tail section, engines, aluminium pieces nothing, absolutely no aircraft parts were obsevred at any place near the Pentagon attack; no wings sheered off, nor passenger body count, if I am not mistaken. Sehr fremde, nicht war?. Initially the outer roof did not collapse until much after the attack. he hole in outer wall was approximately 65 feet wide, or less, The Aircraft had to penetrate some 6 -8 2 feet thick reinforced conrete walls. No wings were sheered off. The aircraft was some 100 feet of wingspan, 7o feet high tail section, One observer had the "airplane" at a distance from the Pentagon that would have necessitated the services of a skilled fighter piolt to bank and aim the aircraft such that the final trajectory was as observed. Security cameras in a filling station pointing at the Pentagon had a clear view of the point of impact yet the footage showed no aricraft striking the building. The security film was taken by the FBI within minutes of the attack. Experts have estimated that with the fuel on board the fires should have lasted days, instead of hours. Papers, computers etc intact were seen where the walls had been destroyed yet little evidence of fire was observed.It was more like a missile strike than aircraft collision. So does sonmeone have any opinions on what really happened on 9/11? Where is the American "Free Press"? Where are the discussions in the printed and elctronic media? What were the curuious "pods" attached to the belly of tghe aircraft striking the twin towers? What were the explosions some firemen heard that sounded like timed charges going off as the towers collpased neatly in a vertical line? "Pow, pow pow, pow, pow pow . . ." as some firemen described their observations? Geistkiesel Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
FYI...been settled for at least a decade now that Willi Münzenberg's associates torched the Reichstag. Btw...I knew Barbara Olson. Haven't heard from her since 9/11. Where are they hiding her?
They had some news piece a couple months ago talking about the % of Europeans who thought that 911 was some big conspiracy. It was over 50% for Germans LOL. Deem crazy europeans Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
It would either be an airliner or a missile. As there is no need to cover up a missile attack, even if it was an "all American" pilot that went nuts, was brainwashed and decided to bomb the Pentagon, it'd still be OK for the public to know that, we’d just think “Yup, figures, hand me a Big Mac." and then "So what, are the Sinfeild re-runs starting?” Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! So the obvious answer is that it must have been an airliner. And as on the same day that two other airliners also hit the WTC then we can conclude that it was simply their buddies trying to hit a couple important buildings in Washinton DC. It’s simple really.
"Hello every one. I am not sure if this topic has been discussed here before" It isn't easy to check on this, and it has been some time. I don't have anything much new to say since this one, for what it's worth.
I've seen possible evidence of a missile or even a possible American-launched missile... If flight 77 did crash into the Pentagon, why did it fly around the Ohio countryside for so long? why DIDN'T the USAF go and investigate when Radio contact was lost at 8:56...the damn plane crashed at 9:30... hmm...Almost like JFK, but like...less popular...
You think the Air Force is going to scramble a bunch of F-16s in 34 minutes to shoot down a plane when there was no warning that there may be a problem??? They lost radio contact. That could mean anything. So even if they did scramble jets, they sure as shit were not going to shoot it down for having a broken radio. That takes a direct order from the President. Not going to happen. So if Flight 77 didnt crash into the Pentagon, then where in the Hell did the Plane and all of its Passengers go?? You dont think they track that stuff on Radar?? Or do you think American passenger planes have stealth technology?
Regardless if the ol' military/industrial complex had something to with it or not, the fact is that they exploited it for profit and war.
Saw this flash saying how it could have been a missle strike. They also said that if a plane were to crash there it would have to fly a high speed just feets of a local highway to crash the way it did.
Actually there was much more left of the passengers and crew aboard the aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon than there was of those aboard the two aircraft that hit the WTC. AFIP (Armed Forces Institute of Pathology) identified all but one of the Flight 77 victims from dental records or DNA. Unless, of course, several dozen AFIP investigators were part of the conspiracy -- or the bodies and body fragments they examined had been gathered somewhere different!
It's not one dimensional to believe that she was killed in another method, such as landing the plane somewhere and then shooting the passengers and then doing whatever pentagon deal they did. Of course, THATS JUST CRAZY! Or not, because you'd get the same results wouldnt you?
i once saw a documentary on local access television by an anonymous director. It talked about conspiriacies at the pentagon, about how it (obviously too) could not have been anything but a missle of some sort. It also talked about the collapses of the heavily steel reinforced buildings surrounding the WTC and that their collapse looked as if it was a demolition and not structural fault. It gave evidences such as the fact that a steel building needs far more heat than something like a fire or inferno to destroy it, and that something was possibly set up under the buildings, as a pre-planned demolition. I dont remember the theories they had as to why the government would do this, but they were interesting. This whole affair is interesting..
ok, so how bout this... Pres shoots missile...missile hits pentagon...Pres blames Iraq...we go to war... this could also explain the WTC..Kamikazi's given the perfect oppurtunity... This would make perfect sense b/c Bush wanted to show his dad up and finish what he started...boom, we're at war, we find saddam... hmm
